Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24919646›Full record

ArticleApplied health economics and health policy2014

Estimating the costs of opioid abuse and dependence from an employer perspective: a retrospective analysis using administrative claims data.

J Bradford Rice, Noam Y Kirson, Amie Shei, Alice Kate G Cummings, Katharine Bodnar, Howard G Birnbaum, Rami Ben-Joseph

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied health economics and health policy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Economic Evaluations of Pharmacologic Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Productivity Losses From Substance Use Disorder in the U.S. in 2023.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Individualized Prospective Prediction of Opioid Use Disorder.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J Bradford RiceAnalysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Avenue, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA, brice@analysisgroup.com.
Noam Y Kirson
Amie Shei
Alice Kate G Cummings
Katharine Bodnar
Howard G Birnbaum
Rami Ben-Joseph
Analysis Group (United States) · USPurdue Pharma (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid abuse and dependence is problematic across many age groups, including the working-age population and their dependents. Little is known, however, about the economic costs of opioid abuse/dependence imposed on employers, who pay for a substantial portion of healthcare costs through their contributions to employer-sponsored health insurance and are also affected by indirect costs such as those due to disability and workplace absenteeism.

objectiveTo provide a comprehensive, current estimate of the economic burden of prescription opioid abuse/dependence to employers.

methodsAdministrative claims from beneficiaries covered by large self-insured companies throughout the USA were used to identify patients, including employees and dependents, who were diagnosed with opioid abuse and/or dependence ('abusers') between 2006 and 2012. Healthcare and work-loss costs for abusers were assessed over a 12-month period and compared with those for patients not diagnosed with abuse ('comparison patients'), using propensity score matching.

results7,658 matched pairs of abusers and comparison patients were analysed. Relative to comparison patients, abusers had significantly higher annual healthcare resource utilization, leading to US$10,627 in per-patient incremental annual healthcare costs. Additionally, abusers had US$1,244 in excess annual work-loss costs. Together, this implies an employer burden for diagnosed abuse of US$1.71 per member per month.

conclusionOpioid abuse/dependence impose a substantial economic burden on employers.

Indexed as

Drug UsersAdultCosts and Cost AnalysisEmploymentFemaleHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthOpioid-Related DisordersPrevalencePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSick LeaveUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24919646
PMCPMC4287687
OpenAlexW2036040528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.