GuidelineWiener klinische Wochenschrift2014
[Consensus statement on the evaluation and therapy of chronic cough in children].
Guideline in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Protracted bacterial bronchitis: The last decade and the road ahead.Pediatric pulmonology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently no consensus guidelines on the evaluation and therapy of chronic cough in children have been published in German. Aim of this study was therefore, after a literature search on all relevant publications and guidelines concerning chronic cough in children, to publish a Statement of the Austrian Society of Pediatrics and The Austrian Society of Pneumology on the evaluation and therapy of chronic childhood cough and to publish a practice based approach. Aim was also to differentiate cough clearly from obstructive airway diseases and to summarize all relevant differential diagnosis using relevant patient history and clinical characteristics and give an overview of therapeutical approaches. The subjective component of cough and the difficulty to assess cough in an objective manner is discussed.
methodsA Cochrane and Medline Search were performed on all relevant literature until Mai 2013.
resultsChronic cough in children is defined as daily cough for more than 4 weeks. Duration of 3 to 8 weeks is sometimes called prolonged or sub-acute cough. Chronic cough may have specific cause and may be a symptom of an underling disease, which needs to be found and treated adequately. Unspecific cough may only be diagnosed after exclusion of all other causes. Any therapeutical approach needs to be re- evaluated and efficacy needs to be reviewed. Parental understanding of the etiology of cough in general and the influence of environmental exposures is essential for diagnosis.
conclusionChronic cough needs a detailed history and various differential diagnoses need to be taken in consideration. Children with persistent complaints without a proper diagnosis need to be seen in a center specialized in Pediatric Respiratory Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.