ArticleTrials2014
Cluster randomized trials utilizing primary care electronic health records: methodological issues in design, conduct, and analysis (eCRT Study).
Article in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What works to recruit general practices to trials? A rapid review.HRB open research · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- A multifaceted intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing among CHIldren with acute COugh and respiratory tract infection: the CHICO cluster RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2023Trial
- Ethical implications of excessive cluster sizes in cluster randomised trials.BMJ quality & safety · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Review
- An overview of optimal designs under a given budget in cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.Statistical methods in medical research · 2023Review
- Using routinely recorded data in a UK RCT: a comparison to standard prospective data collection methods.Trials · 2021Article
- Article
- Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
- Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Engaging GPs and primary care patients in research: implications of the ASPREE trial for future studies.The Medical journal of Australia · 2019Article
- Big data: what it can and cannot achieve.BJPsych advances · 2018Article
- Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2018Article
- Using routinely recorded data in the UK to assess outcomes in a randomised controlled trial: The Trials of Access.Trials · 2017Review
- Efficient design of clinical trials and epidemiological research: is it possible?Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2017Review
- Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2017Article
- Article
- Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).International journal of epidemiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is growing interest in conducting clinical and cluster randomized trials through electronic health records. This paper reports on the methodological issues identified during the implementation of two cluster randomized trials using the electronic health records of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).
methodsTwo trials were completed in primary care: one aimed to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection; the other aimed to increase physician adherence with secondary prevention interventions after first stroke. The paper draws on documentary records and trial datasets to report on the methodological experience with respect to research ethics and research governance approval, general practice recruitment and allocation, sample size calculation and power, intervention implementation, and trial analysis.
resultsWe obtained research governance approvals from more than 150 primary care organizations in England, Wales, and Scotland. There were 104 CPRD general practices recruited to the antibiotic trial and 106 to the stroke trial, with the target number of practices being recruited within six months. Interventions were installed into practice information systems remotely over the internet. The mean number of participants per practice was 5,588 in the antibiotic trial and 110 in the stroke trial, with the coefficient of variation of practice sizes being 0.53 and 0.56 respectively. Outcome measures showed substantial correlations between the 12 months before, and after intervention, with coefficients ranging from 0.42 for diastolic blood pressure to 0.91 for proportion of consultations with antibiotics prescribed, defining practice and participant eligibility for analysis requires careful consideration.
conclusionsCluster randomized trials may be performed efficiently in large samples from UK general practices using the electronic health records of a primary care database. The geographical dispersal of trial sites presents a difficulty for research governance approval and intervention implementation. Pretrial data analyses should inform trial design and analysis plans.
trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN 47558792 and ISRCTN 35701810 (both registered on 17 March 2010).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.