Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24918811›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Assessment of aerobic and respiratory growth in the Lactobacillus casei group.

Teresa Zotta, Annamaria Ricciardi, Rocco G Ianniello, Eugenio Parente, Anna Reale, Franca Rossi, Lucilla Iacumin, Giuseppe Comi, Raffaele Coppola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Isolation and Characterization ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Probiotic Development Strategy Centered on Stability and Regulatory Considerations.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Isolation and characterization ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Metallobiology of Lactobacillaceae in the gut microbiome.Journal of inorganic biochemistry · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Selection ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Quantification and gene expression ofThe Saudi dental journal · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa ZottaIstituto di Scienze dell'Alimentazione-CNR, Avellino, Italy.
Annamaria RicciardiIstituto di Scienze dell'Alimentazione-CNR, Avellino, Italy; Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Rocco G IannielloScuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Eugenio ParenteIstituto di Scienze dell'Alimentazione-CNR, Avellino, Italy; Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy.
Anna RealeIstituto di Scienze dell'Alimentazione-CNR, Avellino, Italy.
Franca RossiDipartimento di Agricoltura, Ambiente e Alimenti, Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
Lucilla IacuminDipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Giuseppe ComiDipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Raffaele CoppolaIstituto di Scienze dell'Alimentazione-CNR, Avellino, Italy; Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Ambiente e Alimenti, Università degli Studi del Molise, Campobasso, Italy.
University of Basilicata · ITInstitute of Food Science · ITUniversity of Molise · ITUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hundred eighty four strains belonging to the species Lactobacillus casei, L. paracasei and L. rhamnosus were screened for their ability to grow under aerobic conditions, in media containing heme and menaquinone and/or compounds generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), in order to identify respiratory and oxygen-tolerant phenotypes. Most strains were able to cope with aerobic conditions and for many strains aerobic growth and heme or heme/menaquinone supplementation increased biomass production compared to anaerobic cultivation. Only four L. casei strains showed a catalase-like activity under anaerobic, aerobic and respiratory conditions and were able to survive in presence of H2O2 (1 mM). Almost all L. casei and L. paracasei strains tolerated menadione (0.2 mM) and most tolerated pyrogallol (50 mM), while L. rhamnosus was usually resistant only to the latter compound. This is the first study in which an extensive screening of oxygen and oxidative stress tolerance of members of the L. casei group has been carried out. Results allowed the selection of strains showing the typical traits of aerobic and respiratory metabolism (increased pH and biomass under aerobic or respiratory conditions) and unique oxidative stress response properties. Aerobic growth and respiration may confer technological and physiological advantages in the L. casei group and oxygen-tolerant phenotypes could be exploited in several food industry applications.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAerobiosisHydrogen PeroxideLacticaseibacillus caseiOxidative StressPyrogallolReactive Oxygen SpeciesVitamin K 3Hydrogen PeroxidePyrogallolReactive Oxygen SpeciesVitamin K 3

Identifiers

PMID24918811
PMCPMC4053349
OpenAlexW1970510658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.