Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24918450›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The human antibody response to the surface of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Casey C Perley, Marc Frahm, Eva M Click, Karen M Dobos, Guido Ferrari, Jason E Stout, Richard Frothingham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Latently and uninfected healthcare workers exposed to TB make protective antibodies againstProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. B Cell and Antibody Responses in Bovine Tuberculosis.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Antigen specificity shapes antibody functions in tuberculosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Casey C PerleyDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Marc FrahmDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Eva M ClickHuman Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Karen M DobosDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Guido FerrariHuman Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jason E StoutDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Richard FrothinghamDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke Medical Center · USColorado State University · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

Yessinia autotransporters (Yaps): Structure, function, and host responseU54AI057157 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEMPOWSKI, GREGORY D · 2003 to 2013
$91.4M
Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Regional Biocontainment Laboratory (RBL)UC6AI058607 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, R SANDERS · 2003 to 2005
$16.3M
Duke University Center for Translational ResearchP30AI051445 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FROTHINGHAM, RICHARD · 2002 to 2006
$8.1M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200400091CNIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040082NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI051445NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057157NIAID NIH HHS UC6 AI058607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine-induced human antibodies to surface components of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumonia are correlated with protection. Monoclonal antibodies to surface components of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are also protective in animal models. We have characterized human antibodies that bind to the surface of live M. tuberculosis.

methodsPlasma from humans with latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (n = 23), active TB disease (n = 40), and uninfected controls (n = 9) were assayed by ELISA for reactivity to the live M. tuberculosis surface and to inactivated M. tuberculosis fractions (whole cell lysate, lipoarabinomannan, cell wall, and secreted proteins).

resultsWhen compared to uninfected controls, patients with active TB disease had higher antibody titers to the surface of live M. tuberculosis (Δ = 0.72 log10), whole cell lysate (Δ = 0.82 log10), and secreted proteins (Δ = 0.62 log10), though there was substantial overlap between the two groups. Individuals with active disease had higher relative IgG avidity (Δ = 1.4 to 2.6) to all inactivated fractions. Surprisingly, the relative IgG avidity to the live M. tuberculosis surface was lower in the active disease group than in uninfected controls (Δ =  -1.53, p = 0.004). Patients with active disease had higher IgG than IgM titers for all inactivated fractions (ratios, 2.8 to 10.1), but equal IgG and IgM titers to the live M. tuberculosis surface (ratio, 1.1). Higher antibody titers to the M. tuberculosis surface were observed in active disease patients who were BCG-vaccinated (Δ = 0.55 log10, p = 0.008), foreign-born (Δ = 0.61 log10, p = 0.004), or HIV-seronegative (Δ = 0.60 log10, p = 0.04). Higher relative IgG avidity scores to the M. tuberculosis surface were also observed in active disease patients who were BCG-vaccinated (Δ = 1.12, p < 0.001) and foreign-born (Δ = 0.87, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Humans with active TB disease produce antibodies to the surface of M. tuberculosis with low avidity and with a low IgG/IgM ratio. Highly-avid IgG antibodies to the M. tuberculosis surface may be an appropriate target for future TB vaccines.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, BacterialAntibody AffinityAntibody FormationFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MLatent TuberculosisMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID24918450
PMCPMC4053328
OpenAlexW2038605458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.