ArticlePloS one2014
How does a carnivore guild utilise a substantial but unpredictable anthropogenic food source? Scavenging on hunter-shot ungulate carcasses by wild dogs/dingoes, red foxes and feral cats in south-eastern Australia revealed by camera traps.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tiny but mighty: Insects can drive carrion decomposition in the absence of facultative vertebrate scavengers.Ecology · 2026Article
- Starving or Stuffing? Plasticity in Wild Boar Body Mass Variations During Summer in a Mediterranean Area.Integrative zoology · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal scavenging dynamics of introduced red foxes across distinct Australian ecosystems.Journal of mammalogy · 2026Article
- Carrion Increases Landscape-Scale Scavenger Activity and Interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- To chew or not to chew? Exploring the influence of scented chew toys on puppy chewing.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Functional significance and welfare implications of chewing in dogs (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Carrion use by a reptile is influenced by season, habitat and competition with an apex mammalian scavenger.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Flooding, season and habitat interact to drive changes in vertebrate scavenging and carcass persistence rates.Oecologia · 2024Article
- Effect of feeding toy and the presence of a dog owner during the feeding time on dog welfare.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- The effect of puppyhood and adolescent diet on the incidence of chronic enteropathy in dogs later in life.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Distinctive diets of eutherian predators in Australia.Royal Society open science · 2022Review
- Roughing it: terrain is crucial in identifying novel translocation sites for the vulnerable brush-tailed rock-wallaby (Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Verification of rabbits as intermediate hosts for Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida) in Australia.Parasitology research · 2020Article
- Feeding responses of the golden jackal after reduction of anthropogenic food subsidies.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Effects of trophy hunting leftovers on the ranging behaviour of large carnivores: a case study on spotted hyenas.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is much interest in understanding how anthropogenic food resources subsidise carnivore populations. Carcasses of hunter-shot ungulates are a potentially substantial food source for mammalian carnivores. The sambar deer (Rusa unicolor) is a large (≥ 150 kg) exotic ungulate that can be hunted throughout the year in south-eastern Australia, and hunters are not required to remove or bury carcasses. We investigated how wild dogs/dingoes and their hybrids (Canis lupus familiaris/dingo), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cats (Felis catus) utilised sambar deer carcasses during the peak hunting seasons (i.e. winter and spring). We placed carcasses at 1-km intervals along each of six transects that extended 4-km into forest from farm boundaries. Visits to carcasses were monitored using camera traps, and the rate of change in edible biomass estimated at ∼ 14-day intervals. Wild dogs and foxes fed on 70% and 60% of 30 carcasses, respectively, but feral cats seldom (10%) fed on carcasses. Spatial and temporal patterns of visits to carcasses were consistent with the hypothesis that foxes avoid wild dogs. Wild dog activity peaked at carcasses 2 and 3 km from farms, a likely legacy of wild dog control, whereas fox activity peaked at carcasses 0 and 4 km from farms. Wild dog activity peaked at dawn and dusk, whereas nearly all fox activity occurred after dusk and before dawn. Neither wild dogs nor foxes remained at carcasses for long periods and the amount of feeding activity by either species was a less important predictor of the loss of edible biomass than season. Reasons for the low impacts of wild dogs and foxes on sambar deer carcass biomass include the spatially and temporally unpredictable distribution of carcasses in the landscape, the rapid rate of edible biomass decomposition in warm periods, low wild dog densities and the availability of alternative food resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.