Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24918067›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2014

Emotional bias of cognitive control in adults with childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Kurt P Schulz, Anne-Claude V Bédard, Jin Fan, Suzanne M Clerkin, Danai Dima, Jeffrey H Newcorn, Jeffrey M Halperin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Emotional dysregulation and stimulant medication in adult ADHD.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kurt P SchulzDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Anne-Claude V BédardDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jin FanDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Psychology, Queens College of the City University of New York, Flushing, NY, USA.
Suzanne M ClerkinDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Psychology, Purchase College, State University of New York, Purchase, NY, USA.
Danai DimaInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Jeffrey H NewcornDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey M HalperinDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Psychology, Queens College of the City University of New York, Flushing, NY, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKing's College London · GBPurchase College · US

Funding

HETEROGENEITY OF ADHD: PREDICTORS OF ADOLESCENT OUTCOMER01MH060698 · NIMH · QUEENS COLLEGE · PI HALPERIN, JEFFREY M · 2001 to 2011
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affect recognition deficits found in individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) across the lifespan may bias the development of cognitive control processes implicated in the pathophysiology of the disorder. This study aimed to determine the mechanism through which facial expressions influence cognitive control in young adults diagnosed with ADHD in childhood. Fourteen probands with childhood ADHD and 14 comparison subjects with no history of ADHD were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a face emotion go/no-go task. Event-related analyses contrasted activation and functional connectivity for cognitive control collapsed over face valence and tested for variations in activation for response execution and inhibition as a function of face valence. Probands with childhood ADHD made fewer correct responses and inhibitions overall than comparison subjects, but demonstrated comparable effects of face emotion on response execution and inhibition. The two groups showed similar frontotemporal activation for cognitive control collapsed across face valence, but differed in the functional connectivity of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with fewer interactions with the subgenual cingulate cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and putamen in probands than in comparison subjects. Further, valence-dependent activation for response execution was seen in the amygdala, ventral striatum, subgenual cingulate cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex in comparison subjects but not in probands. The findings point to functional anomalies in limbic networks for both the valence-dependent biasing of cognitive control and the valence-independent cognitive control of face emotion processing in probands with childhood ADHD. This limbic dysfunction could impact cognitive control in emotional contexts and may contribute to the social and emotional problems associated with ADHD.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBrain MappingCognitionEmotionsFacial ExpressionHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPrefrontal CortexYoung AdultADHDAdultsEmotional biasfMRIGoNo-go taskPrefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID24918067
PMCPMC4050315
OpenAlexW2167708723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.