Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24917940›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2013

Efficacy and safety of oral prucalopride in women with chronic constipation in whom laxatives have failed: an integrated analysis.

Jan Tack, Eamonn Quigley, Michael Camilleri, Lieve Vandeplassche, René Kerstens

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00483886 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prucalopride (R108512) Tablets in Subjects With Chronic Constipation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMovetisRan1998 to 1999Enrolled620ConditionsConstipationArmsPrucalopride, Placebo
NCT00485940 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of R108512 Tablets in Subjects With Chronic Constipation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMovetisRan1998 to 1999Enrolled641ConditionsConstipationArmsPrucalopride, Placebo
NCT00488137 phase3completednot on this map

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prucalopride (R108512) Tablets in Subjects With Chronic Constipation

TypeinterventionalSponsorMovetisRan1998 to 1999Enrolled716ConditionsConstipationArmsPrucalopride, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Effect of prucalopride on symptoms of chronic constipation.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2014
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Management of functional gastrointestinal disorders.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. An update on prucalopride in the treatment of chronic constipation.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. New Options in Constipation Management.Current oncology reports · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan TackDivision of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium.
Eamonn QuigleyAlimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Michael CamilleriCollege of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Lieve VandeplasscheShire-Movetis NV, Turnhout, Belgium.
René KerstensBiostatistics, Shire-Movetis NV, Turnhout, Belgium.
AZ Turnhout · BEKU Leuven · BEMayo Clinic · USUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrucalopride is a selective, high-affinity, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) type 4 (5-HT4) receptor agonist with gastrointestinal prokinetic activities. This integrated analysis of data from three double-blind phase III trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00488137, NCT00483886, NCT00485940) compared the efficacy and safety of prucalopride 2 mg once daily in women with chronic constipation [≤2 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM) per week] in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief with that in the all-patient (AP) population of men and women with chronic constipation who had or had not obtained relief from laxatives.

methodsPatients received prucalopride 2 mg or placebo once-daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included an average of ≥3 SCBM/week and average increases of ≥1 SCBM/week and ≥1 SBM/week over this period. A response on any of these three endpoints was considered to be clinically relevant, and an overall response rate was derived for patients satisfying any of these endpoints.

resultsOf the AP population (n = 1318), 936 were women in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief (WLF). More patients on prucalopride 2 mg than placebo had an average of ≥3 SCBM/week (AP 24.4 vs 11.0%; WLF 24.7 vs 9.2%), an average increase of ≥1 SCBM/week (AP 43.5 vs 24.8%; WLF 44.2 vs 22.6%), and an average increase of ≥1 SBM/week (AP 66.7 vs 38.4%; WLF 68.3 vs 37.0%) (all p < 0.001). Significant differences from placebo were evident in week 1 and sustained thereafter. Overall response rates in the AP and WLF populations, respectively, were 69.7 and 71.0% with prucalopride 2 mg and 44.5 and 41.6% with placebo (p < 0.001). Early (weeks 1-4) response predicted ultimate response over time. Common (>10%) adverse events were abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea, and headache.

conclusionsPrucalopride 2 mg once daily is effective in WLF. The efficacy and safety profile observed in WLF was similar to that in the total evaluated population of patients with chronic constipation who had or had not obtained adequate relief from laxatives.

Indexed as

5-HT4 agonistefficacysafetyserotonergic

Identifiers

PMID24917940
PMCPMC4040783
OpenAlexW2154965232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.