ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2013
Efficacy and safety of oral prucalopride in women with chronic constipation in whom laxatives have failed: an integrated analysis.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prucalopride (R108512) Tablets in Subjects With Chronic Constipation.
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of R108512 Tablets in Subjects With Chronic Constipation
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Prucalopride (R108512) Tablets in Subjects With Chronic Constipation
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of honey suppositories in treating paediatric functional constipation: A comparative study.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Trial
- A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of YH12852, a highly selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist, in healthy subjects and patients with functional constipation.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021Trial
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride in men with chronic constipation.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2015Trial
- Prucalopride improves bowel function and colonic transit time in patients with chronic constipation: an integrated analysis.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2014Trial
- Effect of prucalopride on symptoms of chronic constipation.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2014Trial
- Irritable bowel syndrome management: current insights.Singapore medical journal · 2026Article
- Biofeedback efficacy for outlet dysfunction constipation: Clinical outcomes and predictors of response by a limited approach.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Article
- Review article: diagnosis, management and patient perspectives of the spectrum of constipation disorders.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021Review
- International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CX. Classification of Receptors for 5-hydroxytryptamine; Pharmacology and Function.Pharmacological reviews · 2021Review
- Management of functional gastrointestinal disorders.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2021Article
- Current Opinion on Prucalopride in Gastroparesis and Chronic Constipation Treatment: A Focus on Patient Selection and Safety.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2021Review
- New treatments and therapeutic targets for IBS and other functional bowel disorders.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Review
- Recent advances in understanding and managing chronic constipation.F1000Research · 2018Review
- An update on prucalopride in the treatment of chronic constipation.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2017Review
- New therapeutic perspectives in irritable bowel syndrome: Targeting low-grade inflammation, immuno-neuroendocrine axis, motility, secretion and beyond.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Prucalopride in Chronic Constipation: An Integrated Analysis of Six Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2016Article
- Review
- New Options in Constipation Management.Current oncology reports · 2015Review
- Pharmacoeconomic study of chronic constipation in a secondary care centre.Irish journal of medical science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrucalopride is a selective, high-affinity, 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) type 4 (5-HT4) receptor agonist with gastrointestinal prokinetic activities. This integrated analysis of data from three double-blind phase III trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00488137, NCT00483886, NCT00485940) compared the efficacy and safety of prucalopride 2 mg once daily in women with chronic constipation [≤2 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM) per week] in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief with that in the all-patient (AP) population of men and women with chronic constipation who had or had not obtained relief from laxatives.
methodsPatients received prucalopride 2 mg or placebo once-daily for 12 weeks. Efficacy endpoints included an average of ≥3 SCBM/week and average increases of ≥1 SCBM/week and ≥1 SBM/week over this period. A response on any of these three endpoints was considered to be clinically relevant, and an overall response rate was derived for patients satisfying any of these endpoints.
resultsOf the AP population (n = 1318), 936 were women in whom laxatives had failed to provide adequate relief (WLF). More patients on prucalopride 2 mg than placebo had an average of ≥3 SCBM/week (AP 24.4 vs 11.0%; WLF 24.7 vs 9.2%), an average increase of ≥1 SCBM/week (AP 43.5 vs 24.8%; WLF 44.2 vs 22.6%), and an average increase of ≥1 SBM/week (AP 66.7 vs 38.4%; WLF 68.3 vs 37.0%) (all p < 0.001). Significant differences from placebo were evident in week 1 and sustained thereafter. Overall response rates in the AP and WLF populations, respectively, were 69.7 and 71.0% with prucalopride 2 mg and 44.5 and 41.6% with placebo (p < 0.001). Early (weeks 1-4) response predicted ultimate response over time. Common (>10%) adverse events were abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea, and headache.
conclusionsPrucalopride 2 mg once daily is effective in WLF. The efficacy and safety profile observed in WLF was similar to that in the total evaluated population of patients with chronic constipation who had or had not obtained adequate relief from laxatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.