Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24917870›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2014

Integrating omic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in soybean.

Rupesh Deshmukh, Humira Sonah, Gunvant Patil, Wei Chen, Silvas Prince, Raymond Mutava, Tri Vuong, Babu Valliyodan, Henry T Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Combating Root-Knot Nematodes (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genome-Wide Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rupesh DeshmukhNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Humira SonahNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Gunvant PatilNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Wei ChenNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Silvas PrinceNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Raymond MutavaNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Tri VuongNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Babu ValliyodanNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.
Henry T NguyenNational Center for Soybean Biotechnology and Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri Columbia, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean production is greatly influenced by abiotic stresses imposed by environmental factors such as drought, water submergence, salt, and heavy metals. A thorough understanding of plant response to abiotic stress at the molecular level is a prerequisite for its effective management. The molecular mechanism of stress tolerance is complex and requires information at the omic level to understand it effectively. In this regard, enormous progress has been made in the omics field in the areas of genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics. The emerging field of ionomics is also being employed for investigating abiotic stress tolerance in soybean. Omic approaches generate a huge amount of data, and adequate advancements in computational tools have been achieved for effective analysis. However, the integration of omic-scale information to address complex genetics and physiological questions is still a challenge. In this review, we have described advances in omic tools in the view of conventional and modern approaches being used to dissect abiotic stress tolerance in soybean. Emphasis was given to approaches such as quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and genomic selection (GS). Comparative genomics and candidate gene approaches are also discussed considering identification of potential genomic loci, genes, and biochemical pathways involved in stress tolerance mechanism in soybean. This review also provides a comprehensive catalog of available online omic resources for soybean and its effective utilization. We have also addressed the significance of phenomics in the integrated approaches and recognized high-throughput multi-dimensional phenotyping as a major limiting factor for the improvement of abiotic stress tolerance in soybean.

Indexed as

abiotic stress tolerancegenomicsionomicsphenomicsproteomicssoybeantranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID24917870
PMCPMC4042060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.