Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24917862›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2014

Complexity and Diversity of the NKR-P1:Clr (Klrb1:Clec2) Recognition Systems.

Christina L Kirkham, James R Carlyle

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Aberrant immune regulation and enrichment of stem-like CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Progenitor CD8Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adaptive NKG2CEuropean journal of immunology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genes · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification and Characterization of CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina L KirkhamDepartment of Immunology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Research Institute , Toronto, ON , Canada.
James R CarlyleDepartment of Immunology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Research Institute , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Sunnybrook Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NKR-P1 receptors were identified as prototypical natural killer (NK) cell surface antigens and later shown to be conserved from rodents to humans on NK cells and subsets of T cells. C-type lectin-like in nature, they were originally shown to be capable of activating NK cell function and to recognize ligands on tumor cells. However, certain family members have subsequently been shown to be capable of inhibiting NK cell activity, and to recognize proteins encoded by a family of genetically linked C-type lectin-related ligands. Some of these ligands are expressed by normal, healthy cells, and modulated during transformation, infection, and cellular stress, while other ligands are upregulated during the immune response and during pathological circumstances. Here, we discuss historical and recent developments in NKR-P1 biology that demonstrate this NK receptor-ligand system to be far more complex and diverse than originally anticipated.

Indexed as

CD161ClrC-type lectin-likeinnate immunityLLT1natural killer cellNkrp1Ocil

Identifiers

PMID24917862
PMCPMC4041007
OpenAlexW2046170300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.