Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24917858›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2014

The feasibility of automated online flow cytometry for in-situ monitoring of microbial dynamics in aquatic ecosystems.

Michael D Besmer, David G Weissbrodt, Bradley E Kratochvil, Jürg A Sigrist, Mathias S Weyland, Frederik Hammes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Monitoring of the Single-Cell Behavior of anBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated yeast cultivation control using a biosensor and flow cytometry.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Automated Online Flow Cytometry Advances Microalgal Ecosystem Management asFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rapid Detection Methods for Bacterial Pathogens in Ambient Waters at the Point of Sample Collection: A Brief Review.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael D BesmerDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf, Switzerland ; Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
David G WeissbrodtDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf, Switzerland ; Institute of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Process Engineering in Urban Water Management, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Bradley E KratochvilDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Jürg A SigristDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Mathias S WeylandDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Frederik HammesDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag - Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescent staining coupled with flow cytometry (FCM) is often used for the monitoring, quantification and characterization of bacteria in engineered and environmental aquatic ecosystems including seawater, freshwater, drinking water, wastewater, and industrial bioreactors. However, infrequent grab sampling hampers accurate characterization and subsequent understanding of microbial dynamics in all of these ecosystems. A logic technological progression is high throughput and full automation of the sampling, staining, measurement, and data analysis steps. Here we assess the feasibility and applicability of automated FCM by means of actual data sets produced with prototype instrumentation. As proof-of-concept we demonstrate examples of microbial dynamics in (i) flowing tap water from a municipal drinking water supply network and (ii) river water from a small creek subject to two rainfall events. In both cases, automated measurements were done at 15-min intervals during 12-14 consecutive days, yielding more than 1000 individual data points for each ecosystem. The extensive data sets derived from the automated measurements allowed for the establishment of baseline data for each ecosystem, as well as for the recognition of daily variations and specific events that would most likely be missed (or miss-characterized) by infrequent sampling. In addition, the online FCM data from the river water was combined and correlated with online measurements of abiotic parameters, showing considerable potential for a better understanding of cause-and-effect relationships in aquatic ecosystems. Although several challenges remain, the successful operation of an automated online FCM system and the basic interpretation of the resulting data sets represent a breakthrough toward the eventual establishment of fully automated online microbiological monitoring technologies.

Indexed as

automationbacteriadrinking waterflow cytometry (FCM)monitoringonlinesensorsstaining

Identifiers

PMID24917858
PMCPMC4040452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.