Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24917144›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2014

Mitochondrial polymorphism A10398G and Haplogroup I are associated with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Yi-Ju Li, Mollie A Minear, Xuejun Qin, Jacqueline Rimmler, Michael A Hauser, R Rand Allingham, Robert P Igo, Jonathan H Lass, Sudha K Iyengar, Gordon K Klintworth and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Update on the genetics of corneal endothelial dystrophies.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Ju LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Mollie A MinearDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Xuejun QinDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Jacqueline RimmlerDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Michael A HauserDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
R Rand AllinghamDuke Eye Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Robert P IgoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Jonathan H LassDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Sudha K IyengarDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Gordon K KlintworthDuke Eye Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Natalie A AfshariDuke Eye Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Simon G GregoryDuke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
FECD Genetics Consortium
Duke Medical Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Candidate Genes for Primary Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY013315 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAUSER, MICHAEL A · 2001 to 2011
$4.1M
A Multi-Center Study To Map Genes for Fuchs'DystrophyR01EY016482 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI IYENGAR, SUDHA K · 2005 to 2009
$3.8M
Genomic Convergence in Primary Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY015543 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLINGHAM, ROBERT RAND · 2005 to 2009
$3.4M
Admixture Mapping of Glaucoma Genes in African AmericansR01EY019126 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAUSER, MICHAEL A · 2008 to 2012
$3.2M
Study of Genetic Basis of Fuchs Corneal DystrophyR01EY016514 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KLINTWORTH, GORDON KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$3.1M
Integrative Genetic Analyses in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal DystrophyR01EY023196 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI AFSHARI, NATALIE ADEL, IYENGAR, SUDHA K · 2013 to 2015
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013315NEI NIH HHS R01EY013315NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015543NEI NIH HHS R01EY015543NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016482NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016514NEI NIH HHS R01EY016514NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019126NEI NIH HHS R01EY019126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023196NEI NIH HHS R01EY023196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated whether mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variants affect the susceptibility of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

methodsTen mtDNA variants defining European haplogroups were genotyped in a discovery dataset consisting of 530 cases and 498 controls of European descent from the Duke FECD cohort. Association tests for mtDNA markers and haplogroups were performed using logistic regression models with adjustment of age and sex. Subset analyses included controlling for additional effects of either the TCF4 SNP rs613872 or cigarette smoking. Our replication dataset was derived from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the FECD Genetics Consortium, where genotypes for three of 10 mtDNA markers were available. Replication analyses were performed to compare non-Duke cases to all GWAS controls (GWAS1, N = 3200), and to non-Duke controls (GWAS2, N = 3043).

resultsThe variant A10398G was significantly associated with FECD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.53, 0.98]; P = 0.034), and remains significant after adjusting for smoking status (min P = 0.012). This variant was replicated in GWAS1 (P = 0.019) and GWAS2 (P = 0.036). Haplogroup I was significantly associated with FECD (OR = 0.46; 95% CI = [0.22, 0.97]; P = 0.041) and remains significant after adjusting for the effect of smoking (min P = 0.008) or rs613872 (P = 0.034).

conclusionsThe 10398G allele and Haplogroup I appear to confer significant protective effects for FECD. The effect of A10398G and Haplogroup I to FECD is likely independent of the known TCF4 variant. More data are needed to decipher the interaction between smoking and mtDNA haplogroups.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAgedBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IFemaleFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHaplotypesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitochondriaBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsDNA, MitochondrialElectron Transport Complex IMT-ND3 protein, humanTCF4 protein, humanTranscription Factor 4Transcription Factorsgenetic associationmitochondrial haplogroupoxidative stresssmokingTCF4

Identifiers

PMID24917144
PMCPMC4109404
OpenAlexW2166584318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.