Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24916771›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2014

A multicenter phase 1 study of PX-866 and cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma or recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Daniel W Bowles, Neil Senzer, Diana Hausman, Scott Peterson, Alex Vo, Luke Walker, Roger B Cohen, Antonio Jimeno

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Alterations and molecular targeting of the GSK-3 regulator, PI3K, in head and neck cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2020
    Review
  6. Targeting the PI3K pathway in cancer: are we making headway?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018
    Review
  7. A Multicenter Phase I Study Evaluating Dual PI3K and BRAF Inhibition with PX-866 and Vemurafenib in Patients with Advanced BRAF V600-Mutant Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Adipose tissue dysfunction and its effects on tumor metabolism.Hormone molecular biology and clinical investigation · 2015
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel W BowlesDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS 8117 Aurora, Denver, CO, 80045, USA, daniel.bowles@ucdenver.edu.
Neil Senzer
Diana Hausman
Scott Peterson
Alex Vo
Luke Walker
Roger B Cohen
Antonio Jimeno
Oncotherapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USMary Crowley Cancer Research Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA046934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis phase I, dose-finding study determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and antitumor activity of PX-866, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, combined with cetuximab in patients with incurable colorectal cancer or squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

methodsPX-866 was administered at escalating doses (6-8 mg daily) combined with cetuximab given at a 400 mg/m(2) loading dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly. A "3 + 3" study design was used. Prior therapy with anti-EGFR therapies, including cetuximab, was allowed.

resultsEleven patients were enrolled. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (90.1%), followed by hypomagnesemia (72.2%), vomiting (72.2%), fatigue (54.5%), nausea (54.5%), rash (45.5%) and peripheral edema (40%). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. The RP2D was 8 mg, the same as the single-agent PX-866 MTD. Best responses in 9 evaluable patients were: 4 partial responses (44.4%), 4 stable disease (44.4%), and 1 disease progression (11.1%). The median progression free survival was 106 days (range: 1-271).

conclusionTreatment with PX-866 and cetuximab was tolerated with signs of anti-tumor activity. Further development of this combination is warranted.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGonanesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedMutationAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCetuximabClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesGonanesKRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PX-866ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24916771
OpenAlexW2071647145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.