Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24916694›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2014

Differences in the transcriptional response to fulvestrant and estrogen deprivation in ER-positive breast cancer.

Neill Patani, Anita K Dunbier, Helen Anderson, Zara Ghazoui, Ricardo Ribas, Elizabeth Anderson, Qiong Gao, Roger A'hern, Alan Mackay, Justin Lindemann and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Rat somatic genome editing enables ER+ breast cancer modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ERα promotesGland surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AMPK Activation by Metformin Promotes Survival of Dormant ERClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer as a Model for Translational Research.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Neill PataniAcademic Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Foundation Trust; Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London;
Anita K DunbierAcademic Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Foundation Trust; Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand;
Helen AndersonBreakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London;
Zara GhazouiAcademic Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Foundation Trust;
Ricardo RibasBreakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London;
Elizabeth AndersonAstraZeneca, Macclesfield; Boehringer Ingelheim, Vienna, Austria; and.
Qiong GaoBreakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London;
Roger A'hernClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom;
Alan MackayBreakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London;
Justin LindemannAstraZeneca, Macclesfield;
Robert WellingsAstraZeneca, Macclesfield;
Jill WalkerAstraZeneca, Macclesfield;
Irene KuterMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lesley-Ann MartinBreakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London;
Mitch DowsettAcademic Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Foundation Trust; Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mitch.Dowsett@icr.ac.uk.
Breakthrough · USAstraZeneca (Brazil) · BRBoehringer Ingelheim (Austria) · ATInstitute of Cancer Research · GBMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15955Medical Research Council G1100450The Dunhill Medical Trust RCS/DMT 3RD ROUND (5)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndocrine therapies include aromatase inhibitors and the selective estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator fulvestrant. This study aimed to determine whether the reported efficacy of fulvestrant over anastrozole, and high- over low-dose fulvestrant, reflect distinct transcriptional responses. EXPERIMENTAL

designGlobal gene expression profiles from ERα-positive breast carcinomas before and during presurgical treatment with fulvestrant (n = 22) or anastrozole (n = 81), and corresponding in vitro models, were compared. Transcripts responding differently to fulvestrant and estrogen deprivation were identified and integrated using Gene Ontology, pathway and network analyses to evaluate their potential significance.

resultsThe overall transcriptional response to fulvestrant and estrogen deprivation was correlated (r = 0.61 in presurgical studies, r = 0.87 in vitro), involving downregulation of estrogen-regulated and proliferation-associated genes. The transcriptional response to fulvestrant was of greater magnitude than estrogen deprivation (slope = 0.62 in presurgical studies, slope = 0.63 in vitro). Comparative analyses identified 28 genes and 40 Gene Ontology categories affected differentially by fulvestrant. Seventeen fulvestrant-specific genes, including CAV1/2, SNAI2, and NRP1, associated with ERα, androgen receptor (AR), and TP53, in a network regulating cell cycle, death, survival, and tumor morphology. Eighteen genes responding differently to fulvestrant specifically predicted antiproliferative response to fulvestrant, but not anastrozole. Transcriptional effects of low-dose fulvestrant correlated with high-dose treatment, but were of lower magnitude (ratio = 0.29).

conclusionsThe transcriptional response to fulvestrant has much in common with estrogen deprivation, but is stronger with distinctions potentially attributable to arrest of estrogen-independent ERα activity and involvement of AR signaling. Genes responding differently to fulvestrant may have predictive utility. These data are consistent with the clinical efficacy of fulvestrant versus anastrozole and higher dosing regimens.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEstradiolEstrogensFemaleFulvestrantGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPostmenopauseReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReceptors, EstrogenReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorEstradiolEstrogensFulvestrantReceptors, EstrogenRNA, MessengerRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID24916694
PMCPMC4119788
OpenAlexW2163860217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.