Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24916649›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2015

Willingness to pay for genetic testing for inherited retinal disease.

Sandy Tubeuf, Thomas A Willis, Barbara Potrata, Hilary Grant, Matthew J Allsop, Mushtaq Ahmed, Jenny Hewison, Martin McKibbin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating pharmacogenetic testing into primary care.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandy TubeufLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Thomas A WillisLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Barbara PotrataLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Hilary GrantLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Matthew J AllsopLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Mushtaq AhmedYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Jenny HewisonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Martin McKibbinDepartment of Ophthalmology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBChapel Allerton Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the willingness of adults with inherited retinal disease to undergo and pay for diagnostic genetic testing in three hypothetical scenarios and to explore the factors that influence decision making. Fifty patients were presented with three scenarios whereby genetic testing provided increasing information: confirming the diagnosis and inheritance pattern alone, providing additional information on future visual function, and identifying in addition a new treatment which could stabilise their condition. Willingness to pay (WTP) was elicited using an iterative bidding game. Regression analysis was used to investigate the probability of agreeing to and paying for testing. Qualitative data were also reviewed to provide a comprehensive understanding of WTP and decision making. The majority of participants agreed to undergo genetic testing in each of the three scenarios. Scenario 2 was the least acceptable with 78% of participants agreeing to genetic testing. The probability of agreeing to genetic testing decreased with age. Between 72 and 96% of participants reported a WTP for genetic testing. Average WTP was £539, £1516, and £6895 for scenarios 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Older participants and participants with higher incomes were willing to pay more for testing. Qualitative data provided additional detail about the rationale behind participants' decisions. The study suggests that patients with inherited retinal disease were willing to undergo and to pay for diagnostic genetic testing, suggesting that they valued the information it may provide. However, several patients preferred not to receive prognostic information and were less willing to pay for genetic testing that yielded such detail.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRetinal DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24916649
PMCPMC4326707
OpenAlexW2022713505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.