Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24916436›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2014

Timing of contraceptive initiation and association with future sexual and reproductive outcomes.

Kimberley True, Nathalie Bajos, Aline Bohet, Caroline Moreau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kimberley TrueDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21205, USA.
Nathalie BajosGender, Sexual and Reproductive Health, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, INSERM, Kremlin Bicêtre F-94807, France Université Paris Sud 11, UMRS 1018, Kremlin Bicêtre F-94807, France Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques, Paris F-75020, France.
Aline BohetDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21205, USA Gender, Sexual and Reproductive Health, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, INSERM, Kremlin Bicêtre F-94807, France.
Caroline MoreauDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore MD 21205, USA Gender, Sexual and Reproductive Health, CESP Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, U1018, INSERM, Kremlin Bicêtre F-94807, France cmoreau2@jhu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWho initiates contraception before, at the time or after first sexual intercourse and how does timing of initiation affect future sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Earlier initiation was associated with current utilization of more effective contraception, but had no impact on future unintended pregnancy, abortion or sexually transmitted infection rates, while later initiation was linked to higher rates of unintended pregnancies and abortions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Contraceptive behaviour at first intercourse is associated with later SRH outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were drawn from the FECOND study, the last national SRH study in France, conducted in 2010-2011 by phone among 8645 individuals aged 15-49 years. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsAnalysis was performed among 1552 women under the age of 30 years who were sexually experienced and had used contraception at some point. We used logistic regression models to identify factors associated with timing of contraception initiation relative to first intercourse (earlier, at the time and later) and its predictive value on future sexual and reproductive outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Timing of contraceptive initiation across all three categories (earlier, at the time and later initiators) was dependent on women's age at the time of the survey, country of birth, education level, ease of discussing sex with mother and age of first sex. Using at the time initiators as a reference, later initiators had higher odds of unintended pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.8] and abortion (OR = 1.9), while earlier initiators were more likely to be using more effective contraception at the time of the survey (OR = 1.8). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The exclusion of sexually inexperienced women, a quarter of which had ever used the pill, may have reduced the scope of our analysis on the relevance of contraceptive initiation for non-contraceptive benefits. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe promotion of early initiation of contraception may contribute to long-term use of more effective methods of contraception. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The FECOND study was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health, a grant from the French National Agency of Research (#ANR-08-BLAN-0286-01; PIs N. Bajos, C Moreau) and funding from the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and the National Institute for Demographic Research (INED). None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentAdultAge FactorsContraception BehaviorFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsPregnancySexual BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsTime Factorsabortionadolescentscontraceptive behaviournational surveyunintended pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID24916436
PMCPMC4093989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.