ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2014
Timing of contraceptive initiation and association with future sexual and reproductive outcomes.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mendelian randomization study on the effects of women's reproductive traits and socioeconomic traits on pregnancy complications.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Early sexual debut among adolescent girls and young women in Sierra Leone: A multilevel analysis of prevalence and predictors.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- Reviewing Publicly Available Reports on Child Health Disparities in Indigenous and Remote Communities of Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Applying a gender lens to social norms, couple communication and decision making to increase modern contraceptive use in Ethiopia, a mixed methods study.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Dynamic Change Between Intimate Partner Violence and Contraceptive Use Over Time in Young Adult Men's and Women's Relationships.Journal of sex research · 2019Article
- Contraceptive Initiation Among Women in the United States: Timing, Methods Used, and Pregnancy Outcomes.Pediatrics · 2019Article
- Ecological study on the use of hormonal contraception, abortions and births among teenagers in the Nordic countries.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Prescription contraception use: a cross-sectional population study of psychosocial determinants.BMJ open · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWho initiates contraception before, at the time or after first sexual intercourse and how does timing of initiation affect future sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Earlier initiation was associated with current utilization of more effective contraception, but had no impact on future unintended pregnancy, abortion or sexually transmitted infection rates, while later initiation was linked to higher rates of unintended pregnancies and abortions. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Contraceptive behaviour at first intercourse is associated with later SRH outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data were drawn from the FECOND study, the last national SRH study in France, conducted in 2010-2011 by phone among 8645 individuals aged 15-49 years. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsAnalysis was performed among 1552 women under the age of 30 years who were sexually experienced and had used contraception at some point. We used logistic regression models to identify factors associated with timing of contraception initiation relative to first intercourse (earlier, at the time and later) and its predictive value on future sexual and reproductive outcomes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Timing of contraceptive initiation across all three categories (earlier, at the time and later initiators) was dependent on women's age at the time of the survey, country of birth, education level, ease of discussing sex with mother and age of first sex. Using at the time initiators as a reference, later initiators had higher odds of unintended pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.8] and abortion (OR = 1.9), while earlier initiators were more likely to be using more effective contraception at the time of the survey (OR = 1.8). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The exclusion of sexually inexperienced women, a quarter of which had ever used the pill, may have reduced the scope of our analysis on the relevance of contraceptive initiation for non-contraceptive benefits. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe promotion of early initiation of contraception may contribute to long-term use of more effective methods of contraception. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The FECOND study was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health, a grant from the French National Agency of Research (#ANR-08-BLAN-0286-01; PIs N. Bajos, C Moreau) and funding from the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and the National Institute for Demographic Research (INED). None of the authors have a conflict of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.