Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24916145›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2014

'Cool! and creepy': engaging with college student stakeholders in Michigan's biobank.

Tevah Platt, Jodyn Platt, Daniel B Thiel, Nicole Fisher, Sharon L R Kardia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tevah PlattLife Sciences and Society Program, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Suite 4605, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA, tevah@umich.edu.
Jodyn Platt
Daniel B Thiel
Nicole Fisher
Sharon L R Kardia

Funding

Health Services Research Training Years 32-36T32HS000053 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HIRTH, RICHARD A · 1992 to 2024
$7.3M
Linking Community Engagement Research to Public Health Biobank PracticeR01HD067264 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KARDIA, SHARON L · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000053NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large population biobanks, important resources for genomic research, also present ethical challenges. The Michigan BioTrust for Health makes dried bloodspots (DBS) leftover from newborn screening, including ~4.5 million collected before 2010 without written consent, available for health research. Absent prospectively gathered consent and/or current engagement with 18- to 29-year olds, little is known about opinions and beliefs from this age group about use of the bloodspots for research. We engaged 2,101 students-BioTrust participants and their peers-at information booths at 20 college campuses across the state to educate youth about the BioTrust and gather information about consent preferences and about hopes and concerns about this public health program. We surveyed student stakeholder DBS research consent preferences and fielded a "postengagement" survey to gauge the attitudes of participants and to evaluate the campus engagement. The most prevalent themes in open-ended comments were support for biobank research and concern that Michiganders are not aware of their participation. While 78 % of students said they would, if asked, opt in to the BioTrust, half of these preferred to be contacted each time a researcher sought to use their DBS. Students reported great interest in the topic and strong likelihood to share what they had learned. BioTrust participants are interested in learning about their role in an initiative whose goals they widely support. Public engagement is particularly important to biobank participants who, absent traditional consent practices, are unaware of their participation. Health-fair style engagements were effective for targeting college-aged stakeholders, communicating complex messages, and likely increasing knowledge. Retrospective biobanks and biobanks that collect proxy consent need policies to respect those who would opt out and will need resources to educate participants and conduct community outreach that is a safeguard to public trust.

Identifiers

PMID24916145
PMCPMC4159476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.