Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Safety and efficacy of second-line treatment with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in combination of panitumumab and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on RCT.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Treatments Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI and biotherapy versus FOLFIRI alone for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Panitumumab in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2018Review
- Article
- A randomized Phase II clinical study of combining panitumumab and bevacizumab, plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and KRAS mutation.OncoTargets and therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the efficacy and safety of a new second-line chemotherapy of combining folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with both panitumumab and bevacizumab to treat patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients with mCRC and unsuccessful previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were included in the study. The FOLFIRI arm was given FOLFIRI only. The FOLFIRI+PB arm was given panitumumab (3 mg/kg) and bevacizumab (3 mg/kg) plus FOLFIRI every other week. Between 2009 and 2013, 155 and 137 patients were included in the FOLFIRI arm and FOLFIRI+PB arm, respectively. The response rate was 40.1 % for FOLFIRI+PB arm versus 30.1 % for FOLFIRI arm. The disease-controlled rate in FOLFIRI+PB arm was improved to 62.2 from 50.2 % in FOLFIRI arm. The median overall survival was 13.9 months in FOLFIRI+PB arm as compared to 10.7 months in FOLFIRI arm. A series of adverse events were comparable between two arms, whereas some of the antibody therapy-associated toxicities were observed in FOLFIRI+PB arm. The new strategy of combining panitumumab and bevacizumab with FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for patients with mCRC is safe and feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24915899What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.