Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24915863›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2014

Multi-disciplinary communication networks for skin risk assessment in nursing homes with high IT sophistication.

Gregory L Alexander, Kalyan S Pasupathy, Linsey M Steege, E Bradley Strecker, Kathleen M Carley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nursing Information Flow in Long-Term Care Facilities.Applied clinical informatics · 2018
    Article
  7. A national report of nursing home information technology: year 1 results.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory L AlexanderUniversity of Missouri, Sinclair School of Nursing, United States. Electronic address: alexanderg@missouri.edu.
Kalyan S PasupathyHealth Care Policy & Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Harwick Bldg. 2-42, Rochester, MN 55905, United States. Electronic address: Pasupathy.Kalyan@mayo.edu.
Linsey M SteegeSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, K6/362 CSC, Madison, WI 53792-2455, United States. Electronic address: LSteege@wisc.edu.
E Bradley StreckerUniversity of Missouri, Sinclair School of Nursing, United States. Electronic address: ebs4k8@mail.missouri.edu.
Kathleen M CarleyInstitute for Software Research, Carnegie Mellon University, Office: Wean Hall 5130, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States. Electronic address: kathleen.carley@cs.cmu.edu.

Funding

Assessing the Relationship Between IT Sophistication and Nursing Home QualityK08HS016862 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ALEXANDER, GREGORY L. · 2007 to 2011
$519k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS016862AHRQ HHS K08HS016862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of nursing home (NH) information technology (IT) in quality improvement has not been clearly established, and its impacts on communication between care givers and patient outcomes in these settings deserve further attention.

objectivesIn this research, we describe a mixed method approach to explore communication strategies used by healthcare providers for resident skin risk in NH with high IT sophistication (ITS).

methodsSample included NH participating in the statewide survey of ITS. We incorporated rigorous observation of 8- and 12-h shifts, and focus groups to identify how NH IT and a range of synchronous and asynchronous tools are used. Social network analysis tools and qualitative analysis were used to analyze data and identify relationships between ITS dimensions and communication interactions between care providers.

resultsTwo of the nine ITS dimensions (resident care-technological and administrative activities-technological) and total ITS were significantly negatively correlated with number of unique interactions. As more processes in resident care and administrative activities are supported by technology, the lower the number of observed unique interactions. Additionally, four thematic areas emerged from staff focus groups that demonstrate how important IT is to resident care in these facilities including providing resident-centered care, teamwork and collaboration, maintaining safety and quality, and using standardized information resources.

conclusionOur findings in this study confirm prior research that as technology support (resident care and administrative activities) and overall ITS increases, observed interactions between staff members decrease. Conversations during staff interviews focused on how technology facilitated resident centered care through enhanced information sharing, greater virtual collaboration between team members, and improved care delivery. These results provide evidence for improving the design and implementation of IT in long term care systems to support communication and associated resident outcomes.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationSkin CareComputer Communication NetworksFocus GroupsHumansInformation SystemsNursing HomesQuality ImprovementRisk AssessmentCommunicationInformation technologyNursing homeSocial network analysisWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID24915863
PMCPMC5958047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.