Trial reportEpilepsia2014
Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study.
Trial report in Epilepsia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00520741 (A Historical-controlled, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to Lacosamide 400 mg/Day Monotherapy in Subjects With Partial-onset Seizures), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Historical-controlled, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Conversion to Lacosamide 400 mg/Day Monotherapy in Subjects With Partial-onset Seizures
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Movement disorders associated with antiseizure medications: A systematic review.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Long-term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2019Trial
- Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizures.Neurology · 2019Trial
- Time-to-Seizure Modeling of Lacosamide Used in Monotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2017Trial
- Conversion to eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy: A pooled analysis of 2 phase III studies.Neurology · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Efficacy and safety of conversion to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures: a historical-control phase III study.BMC neurology · 2015Trial
- Advances in Sodium Channel Modulation in Epilepsy Therapy: Focus on Eslicarbazepine, Lacosamide and Cenobamate.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Underrepresented and Underserved Populations in Neurological Research.Seminars in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- The therapeutic effects of lacosamide on epilepsy-associated comorbidities.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Effectiveness and safety of Lacosamide therapy for children with focal epilepsy: a real world study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Long-term safety and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy in patients with epilepsy: Results from a multicenter, open-label trial.Epilepsia open · 2021Article
- Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide in Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Efficacy and tolerability of antiseizure drugs.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2021Review
- From clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs to treatment.Epilepsia open · 2018Article
- Lacosamide monotherapy in clinical practice: A retrospective chart review.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2018Article
- Review
- Sodium Channel Blockers in the Treatment of Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy.
methodsThis historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16-70 years on stable doses of 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing 2-40 partial-onset seizures per 28 days during the 8-week prospective Baseline. Patients were randomized to lacosamide 400 or 300 mg/day (3:1 ratio), starting at 200 mg/day and titrated over 3 weeks to randomized dose. Patients then withdrew background AEDs over 6 weeks and entered a 10-week Monotherapy Phase. The primary assessment was the Kaplan-Meier-predicted percentage of patients on 400 mg/day in the full analysis set (FAS) meeting ≥ 1 predefined seizure-related exit criterion by day 112, compared with the historical-control threshold (65.3%).
resultsFour hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled and were eligible for safety analyses (400 mg/day, n = 319; 300 mg/day, n = 106). A total of 271 (63.8%) of 425 patients completed the Lacosamide Maintenance Phase (combined AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Phases). Among 284 patients in the 400 mg/day group in the FAS, 82 (28.9%) met ≥ 1 exit criterion; the Kaplan-Meier-predicted exit percentage at day 112 for 400 mg/day (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6-35.5%) was lower than the historical control. When exit events, withdrawal due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were summed (n = 90), the predicted exit percentage (32.3%; 95% CI 26.8-37.8%) was also lower than the historical control. Most patients receiving 400 mg/day reported some improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (75.4%) and Patient Global Impression of Change (74.3%). Overall, the most common (>10%) TEAEs were dizziness (24.0%), headache (14.4%), nausea (13.4%), convulsion (11.5%), somnolence (10.4%), and fatigue (10.1%); most (74.1%) were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Seventy-two patients (16.9%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Seventeen patients (4%, all receiving 400 mg/day) experienced serious AEs. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy was effective, with a favorable safety profile in patients with focal epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.