Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24915755›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

A germline mutation in the BRCA1 3'UTR predicts Stage IV breast cancer.

Jemima J Dorairaj, David W Salzman, Deirdre Wall, Tiffany Rounds, Carina Preskill, Catherine A W Sullivan, Robert Lindner, Catherine Curran, Kim Lezon-Geyda, Terri McVeigh and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic architecture of mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Global trends inFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jemima J Dorairaj
David W Salzman
Deirdre Wall
Tiffany Rounds
Carina Preskill
Catherine A W Sullivan
Robert Lindner
Catherine Curran
Kim Lezon-Geyda
Terri McVeigh
Lyndsay Harris
John Newell
Michael J Kerin
Marie Wood
Nicola Miller
Joanne B WeidhaasDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. joanne.weidhaas@yale.edu.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEYale University · USUniversity of Vermont · USHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

MicroRNAs to Understand Cause and Outcome in Breast CancerR01CA157749 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SLACK, FRANK J., WEIDHAAS, JOANNE B · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Let-7 microRNAs in Lung Cancer: Altering Growth and RadioresistanceR01CA131301 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SLACK, FRANK J., WEIDHAAS, JOANNE B · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 01R01CA157749-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131301NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA germline, variant in the BRCA1 3'UTR (rs8176318) was previously shown to predict breast and ovarian cancer risk in women from high-risk families, as well as increased risk of triple negative breast cancer. Here, we tested the hypothesis that this variant predicts tumor biology, like other 3'UTR mutations in cancer.

methodsThe impact of the BRCA1-3'UTR-variant on BRCA1 gene expression, and altered response to external stimuli was tested in vitro using a luciferase reporter assay. Gene expression was further tested in vivo by immunoflourescence staining on breast tumor tissue, comparing triple negative patient samples with the variant (TG or TT) or non-variant (GG) BRCA1 3'UTR. To determine the significance of the variant on clinically relevant endpoints, a comprehensive collection of West-Irish breast cancer patients were tested for the variant. Finally, an association of the variant with breast screening clinical phenotypes was evaluated using a cohort of women from the High Risk Breast Program at the University of Vermont.

resultsLuciferase reporters with the BRCA1-3'UTR-variant (T allele) displayed significantly lower gene expression, as well as altered response to external hormonal stimuli, compared to the non-variant 3'UTR (G allele) in breast cancer cell lines. This was confirmed clinically by the finding of reduced BRCA1 gene expression in triple negative samples from patients carrying the homozygous TT variant, compared to non-variant patients. The BRCA1-3'UTR-variant (TG or TT) also associated with a modest increased risk for developing breast cancer in the West-Irish cohort (OR=1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p=0.033). More importantly, patients with the BRCA1-3'UTR-variant had a 4-fold increased risk of presenting with Stage IV disease (p=0.018, OR=3.37, 95% CI 1.3-11.0). Supporting that this finding is due to tumor biology, and not difficulty screening, obese women with the BRCA1-3'UTR-variant had significantly less dense breasts (p=0.0398) in the Vermont cohort.

conclusionA variant in the 3'UTR of BRCA1 is functional, leading to decreased BRCA1 expression, modest increased breast cancer risk, and most importantly, presentation with stage IV breast cancer, likely due to aggressive tumor biology.

Indexed as

Germ-Line Mutation3' Untranslated RegionsBRCA1 ProteinDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsTriple Negative Breast Neoplasms3' Untranslated RegionsBRCA1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID24915755
PMCPMC4059881
OpenAlexW2057868297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.