Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24915298›Full record

ReviewAutophagy2014

The autophagic roles of Rab small GTPases and their upstream regulators: a review.

Zsuzsanna Szatmári, Miklós Sass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autophagy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Hepatitis B virus entry, assembly, and egress.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. An unbiased proteomic analysis of PAD4 in human monocytes: novel substrates, binding partners and subcellular localizations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Autophagy in Heart Failure: Insights into Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zsuzsanna SzatmáriDepartment of Anatomy, Cell and Developmental Biology; Eötvös Loránd University; Budapest, Hungary.
Miklós SassDepartment of Anatomy, Cell and Developmental Biology; Eötvös Loránd University; Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroautophagy is an evolutionarily conserved degradative process of eukaryotic cells. Double-membrane vesicles called autophagosomes sequester portions of cytoplasm and undergo fusion with the endolysosomal pathway in order to degrade their content. There is growing evidence that members of the small GTPase RAB protein family-the well-known regulators of membrane trafficking and fusion events-play key roles in the regulation of the autophagic process. Despite numerous studies focusing on the functions of RAB proteins in autophagy, the importance of their upstream regulators in this process emerged only in the past few years. In this review, we summarize recent advances on the effects of RABs and their upstream modulators in the regulation of autophagy. Moreover, we discuss how impairment of these proteins alters the autophagic process leading to several generally known human diseases.

Indexed as

AutophagyDiseaseEndosomesGolgi ApparatusHumansModels, Biologicalrab GTP-Binding Proteinsrab GTP-Binding ProteinsautophagyGAPGEFRABsmall GTPases

Identifiers

PMID24915298
PMCPMC4203544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.