Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24915135›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)2015

Carbon dioxide insufflation during screening unsedated colonoscopy: a randomised clinical trial.

Miroslaw Szura, Radoslaw Pach, Andrzej Matyja, Jan Kulig

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01461564 (Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Air Versus Carbon Dioxide in Screening Unsedated Colonoscopy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01461564 phase4completednot on this map

Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Air Versus Carbon Dioxide in Screening Unsedated Colonoscopy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJagiellonian UniversityRan2010 to 2011Enrolled200ConditionsPolypsArmsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Total Colonic Decompression Fails to Decrease Post- Colonoscopy Abdominal Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miroslaw SzuraFirst Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.
Radoslaw Pach
Andrzej Matyja
Jan Kulig
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the methods used to reduce pain and discomfort during colonoscopy is insufflation of carbon dioxide instead of air. However, the actual benefit of carbon dioxide insufflation is not unequivocally proven. The aim of the study was to evaluate the advantages of carbon dioxide insufflation during screening colonoscopy. A total of 200 patients undergoing screening colonoscopy between 2010 and 2011 were included in the prospective, randomized study carried out in a surgical referral center. Screening unsedated colonoscopy with either air or carbon dioxide insufflation was performed; patients were randomly assigned to air or carbon dioxide group by means of computer-generated randomization lists. All examinations were performed in an ambulatory setting with standard videocolonoscopes. The main outcomes analyzed were (a) duration of the entire procedure, (b) cecal intubation time, and (c) pain severity immediately, 15, and 60 min after the procedure. Group I included 59 women and 41 men and group II included 51 women and 49 men. The duration of the procedure was circa 10 min in both groups. Pain score values immediately and 15 min after the procedure were similar in both groups (P=0.624 and 0.305, respectively). A lower pain score was observed only after 60 min in patients insufflated with carbon dioxide (1.28 vs. 1.54, P=0.008). No pain reduction was observed in women and in obese patients (BMI>30). Carbon dioxide insufflation during unsedated screening colonoscopy does not decrease the duration of the procedure and appears to reduce pain intensity at 60 min after examination to an extent without clinical significance. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01461564.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesCarbon DioxideColonoscopyFemaleHumansInsufflationMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesCarbon DioxideHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID24915135
PMCPMC4495875
OpenAlexW1966775239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.