Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24914381›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Conventional endoscopic features are not sufficient to differentiate small, early colorectal cancer.

Wan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Colonoscopy in Intestinal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current strategies for malignant pedunculated colorectal polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wan ParkWan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
Bun KimWan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
Soo Jung ParkWan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
Jae Hee CheonWan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
Tae Il KimWan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
Won Ho KimWan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.
Sung Pil HongWan Park, Bun Kim, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the depth of invasion of small, early colorectal cancers (ECCs) using conventional endoscopic features.

methodsFrom January 2005 to September 2011, colonoscopy cohort showed that a total of 72 patients with small colorectal cancers with the size less than 20 mm underwent colonoscopy at the Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Among them, 8 patients were excluded due to incomplete medical records. Finally, a total of 64 ECCs with submucosa (SM) invasion and size less than 20 mm were included. One hundred fifty-two adenomas with size less than 20 mm were included as controls. Nine endoscopic features, including seven morphological findings (i.e., loss of lobulation, excavation, demarcated and depressed areas, stalk swelling, fullness, fold convergence, and bleeding ulcers), pit patterns, and non-lifting signs, were evaluated retrospectively. All endoscopic features were evaluated by two experienced endoscopists who have each performed over 1000 colonoscopies annually for more than five years without knowledge of the histology.

resultsAmong the morphological findings, the size of deep submucosal cancers was bigger than that of superficial lesions (16.9 mm vs 12.3 mm, P < 0.001). Also, demarcated depressed areas, stalk swelling, and fullness were more common in deep SM cancers than in superficial tumors (demarcated depressed areas: 52.0% vs 15.7%, P < 0.001; stalk swelling: 100% vs 4.2%, P < 0.001; fullness: 25.0% vs 0%, P = 0.001). Among deep SM cancers, 96% of polyps showed invasive pit patterns, whereas 19.4% of superficial tumors showed invasive pit patterns (P < 0.001). A positive non-lifting sign was more common in deep SM cancers (85.0% vs 28.6%, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of invasive morphology, invasive pit patterns, and non-lifting signs for deep SM cancers were 71%, 82%, and 75%, respectively.

conclusionConventional endoscopic findings were insufficient to discriminate small, deep SM cancers from superficial SM cancers by white light, standard colonoscopy.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAdenomaAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesColonoscopyColorectal neoplasmsDifferential diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID24914381
PMCPMC4047345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.