Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24914232›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2014

Finding abbreviations in biomedical literature: three BioC-compatible modules and four BioC-formatted corpora.

Rezarta Islamaj Doğan, Donald C Comeau, Lana Yeganova, W John Wilbur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Collaborative relation annotation and quality analysis in Markyt environment.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  4. HITSZ_CDR: an end-to-end chemical and disease relation extraction system for BioCreative V.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. BioC interoperability track overview.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Review
  7. BioC implementations in Go, Perl, Python and Ruby.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rezarta Islamaj DoğanNational Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA Rezarta.Islamaj@nih.gov.
Donald C ComeauNational Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Lana YeganovaNational Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
W John WilburNational Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

Funding

Natural Language Processing Techniques To Enhance Information Access.ZIALM000090 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI WILBUR, WILLY · 2009 to 2015
$3.4M
Free Text Gene Name RecognitionZIALM000093 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI WILBUR, WILLY · 2009 to 2015
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BioC is a recently created XML format to share text data and annotations, and an accompanying input/output library to promote interoperability of data and tools for natural language processing of biomedical text. This article reports the use of BioC to address a common challenge in processing biomedical text information-that of frequent entity name abbreviation. We selected three different abbreviation definition identification modules, and used the publicly available BioC code to convert these independent modules into BioC-compatible components that interact seamlessly with BioC-formatted data, and other BioC-compatible modules. In addition, we consider four manually annotated corpora of abbreviations in biomedical text: the Ab3P corpus of 1250 PubMed abstracts, the BIOADI corpus of 1201 PubMed abstracts, the old MEDSTRACT corpus of 199 PubMed(®) citations and the Schwartz and Hearst corpus of 1000 PubMed abstracts. Annotations in these corpora have been re-evaluated by four annotators and their consistency and quality levels have been improved. We converted them to BioC-format and described the representation of the annotations. These corpora are used to measure the three abbreviation-finding algorithms and the results are given. The BioC-compatible modules, when compared with their original form, have no difference in their efficiency, running time or any other comparable aspects. They can be conveniently used as a common pre-processing step for larger multi-layered text-mining endeavors. Database URL: Code and data are available for download at the BioC site: http://bioc.sourceforge.net.

Indexed as

Abbreviations as TopicBiological OntologiesData MiningNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithms

Identifiers

PMID24914232
PMCPMC4051513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.