ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2015
Detecting the psychosis prodrome across high-risk populations using neuroanatomical biomarkers.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Psychotic relapse prediction via biomarker monitoring: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Improving Prognostic Accuracy in Subjects at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Systematic Review of Predictive Models and Meta-analytical Sequential Testing Simulation.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2017Pooled it
- White matter integrity in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a systematic review and discussion of the role of polyunsaturated fatty acids.BMC psychiatry · 2016Pooled it
- Predicting Response to Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Schizophrenia Using Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multisite Machine Learning Analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2018Trial
- Structural and Functional Neuroimaging Biomarkers as Predictors of Psychosis Conversion in Ultra-High Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Diagnostic value of regional homogeneity and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the classification of schizophrenia and bipolar disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Can artificial intelligence be the future solution to the enormous challenges and suffering caused by Schizophrenia?Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Unveiling Promising Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Schizophrenia Through Clinical and Genetic Perspectives.Neuroscience bulletin · 2024Review
- Multimodal fusion of brain signals for robust prediction of psychosis transition.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Using brain structural neuroimaging measures to predict psychosis onset for individuals at clinical high-risk.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Exploring the relationship between frequent cannabis use, belief updating under uncertainty and psychotic-like symptoms.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Biomarkers for Psychosis: Are We There Yet? Umbrella Review of 1478 Biomarkers.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2024Article
- Detecting schizophrenia with 3D structural brain MRI using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Sex- and Age-Specific Deviations in Cerebellar Structure and Their Link With Symptom Dimensions and Clinical Outcome in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Article
- A Review of Potential Neuroimaging Biomarkers of Schizophrenia-Risk.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2023Article
- Machine Learning and Non-Affective Psychosis: Identification, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2022Review
- Identification of texture MRI brain abnormalities on first-episode psychosis and clinical high-risk subjects using explainable artificial intelligence.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review of Etiopathogenetic, Diagnostic and Treatment Aspects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Prediction of transition to psychosis from an at-risk mental state using structural neuroimaging, genetic, and environmental data.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Improving across-dataset brain tissue segmentation for MRI imaging using transformer.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2022Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, the MRI-based individualized prediction of psychosis has only been demonstrated in single-site studies. It remains unclear if MRI biomarkers generalize across different centers and MR scanners and represent accurate surrogates of the risk for developing this devastating illness. Therefore, we assessed whether a MRI-based prediction system identified patients with a later disease transition among 73 clinically defined high-risk persons recruited at two different early recognition centers. Prognostic performance was measured using cross-validation, independent test validation, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Transition outcomes were correctly predicted in 80% of test cases (sensitivity: 76%, specificity: 85%, positive likelihood ratio: 5.1). Thus, given a 54-month transition risk of 45% across both centers, MRI-based predictors provided a 36%-increase of prognostic certainty. After stratifying individuals into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups using the predictor's decision score, the high- vs low-risk groups had median psychosis-free survival times of 5 vs 51 months and transition rates of 88% vs 8%. The predictor's decision function involved gray matter volume alterations in prefrontal, perisylvian, and subcortical structures. Our results support the existence of a cross-center neuroanatomical signature of emerging psychosis enabling individualized risk staging across different high-risk populations. Supplementary results revealed that (1) potentially confounding between-site differences were effectively mitigated using statistical correction methods, and (2) the detection of the prodromal signature considerably depended on the available sample sizes. These observations pave the way for future multicenter studies, which may ultimately facilitate the neurobiological refinement of risk criteria and personalized preventive therapies based on individualized risk profiling tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.