ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014
Singular value decomposition as a tool for background corrections in time-resolved XFEL scattering data.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis strategies for time-resolved X-ray solution scattering at high repetition rate XFEL sources.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Mixed gain detector configurations for time-resolved X-ray solution scattering.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- Reaction dynamics studiedChemical science · 2022Review
- Estimating signal and noise of time-resolved X-ray solution scattering data at synchrotrons and XFELs.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2020Article
- SVD-aided non-orthogonal decomposition (SANOD) method to exploit prior knowledge of spectral components in the analysis of time-resolved data.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Transient two-dimensional vibrational spectroscopy of an operating molecular machine.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Model-independent particle species disentanglement by X-ray cross-correlation scattering.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Tracking Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Shifts in Data with TREND.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Methods for analysis of size-exclusion chromatography-small-angle X-ray scattering and reconstruction of protein scattering.Journal of applied crystallography · 2015Article
- Correction of complex nonlinear signal response from a pixel array detector.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2015Article
- Visualizing the non-equilibrium dynamics of photoinduced intramolecular electron transfer with femtosecond X-ray pulses.Nature communications · 2015Article
- The birth of a new field.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of new X-ray light sources, XFELs, with unprecedented time and brilliance characteristics has led to the availability of very large datasets with high time resolution and superior signal strength. The chaotic nature of the emission processes in such sources as well as entirely novel detector demands has also led to significant challenges in terms of data analysis. This paper describes a heuristic approach to datasets where spurious background contributions of a magnitude similar to (or larger) than the signal of interest prevents conventional analysis approaches. The method relies on singular-value decomposition of no-signal subsets of acquired datasets in combination with model inputs and appears generally applicable to time-resolved X-ray diffuse scattering experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.