Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24913989›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2014

Comparing different analysis methods for quantifying the MRI amide proton transfer (APT) effect in hyperacute stroke patients.

Y K Tee, G W J Harston, N Blockley, Thomas W Okell, J Levman, F Sheerin, M Cellerini, P Jezzard, J Kennedy, S J Payne and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Study of Power Equivalent Continuous Approximation Based on the Recent Consensus Recommendations for Brain Tumor Imaging with Pulsed Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer at 3T.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of Saturation Pulse Duration and Power on pH-weighted Amide Proton Transfer Imaging: A Phantom Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Y K TeeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for Doctoral Training in Healthcare Innovation, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
G W J Harston
N Blockley
Thomas W Okell
J Levman
F Sheerin
M Cellerini
P Jezzard
J Kennedy
S J Payne
M A Chappell
University of Oxford · GBOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701128The Dunhill Medical Trust OSRP1/1006Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 088877/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is a pH mapping method based on the chemical exchange saturation transfer phenomenon that has potential for penumbra identification following stroke. The majority of the literature thus far has focused on generating pH-weighted contrast using magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry analysis instead of quantitative pH mapping. In this study, the widely used asymmetry analysis and a model-based analysis were both assessed on APT data collected from healthy subjects (n = 2) and hyperacute stroke patients (n = 6, median imaging time after onset = 2 hours 59 minutes). It was found that the model-based approach was able to quantify the APT effect with the lowest variation in grey and white matter (≤ 13.8 %) and the smallest average contrast between these two tissue types (3.48 %) in the healthy volunteers. The model-based approach also performed quantitatively better than the other measures in the hyperacute stroke patient APT data, where the quantified APT effect in the infarct core was consistently lower than in the contralateral normal appearing tissue for all the patients recruited, with the group average of the quantified APT effect being 1.5 ± 0.3 % (infarct core) and 1.9 ± 0.4 % (contralateral). Based on the fitted parameters from the model-based analysis and a previously published pH and amide proton exchange rate relationship, quantitative pH maps for hyperacute stroke patients were generated, for the first time, using APT imaging.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAmidesBrain ChemistryFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProtonsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityStrokeAmidesProtonsAmide proton transfer (APT) imagingchemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imagingmagnetization transfer (MT) imagingMRIpHstroke

Identifiers

PMID24913989
PMCPMC4737232
OpenAlexW1778954217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.