Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24913988›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2014

Utility of FDG-PET in clinical neuroendocrine prostate cancer.

Daniel E Spratt, Somali Gavane, Lisa Tarlinton, Shoaib B Fareedy, Michael G Doran, Michael J Zelefsky, Joseph R Osborne

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A dual-tracer approach for enhanced nodal staging in prostate cancer: the role of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Molecular imaging phenotyping for selecting and monitoring radioligand therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Synthesis and Evaluation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Beyond the Prognostic Value of 2-[Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel E SprattDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Somali Gavane
Lisa Tarlinton
Shoaib B Fareedy
Michael G Doran
Michael J Zelefsky
Joseph R Osborne
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

Immuno-PET With Anti-PSMA 89Zr-J591 mAb For Molecular Imaging of Prostate CancerR21CA153177 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI OSBORNE, JOSEPH REGINALD · 2011 to 2012
$404k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA153177NCI NIH HHS R21 CA153177-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has well-characterized limitations in prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA). However, data assessing the utility of PET in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is limited to isolated case reports. Herein, we describe the first case series to assess the utility of FDG-PET in NEPC.

methodsInclusion criteria consisted of clinically progressive metastatic PCA in the setting of a chromogranin-A levels >1.5× the upper limit of normal, and ≥1 FDG-PET scan after the diagnosis of NEPC, which yielded 23 patients. All metastatic lesions on CT, PET, and bone scan were read by two independent physicians.

resultsFive hundred ninety two unique lesions were identified across all imaging modalities, 510 were bone metastases, and 82 were soft tissue metastases. Of bone lesions, 22.2%, 92.7%, and 77.6% were detected by PET, CT, and bone scan, respectively. Of soft tissue lesions, 95.1% and 97.5% were detected by PET and CT, respectively. Stratified by the median survival from NEPC diagnosis, patients who survived <2.2 versus ≥2.2 years had more PET avid bone (8 vs. 2, P = 0.06) and soft tissue lesions (7 vs. 1, P = 0.01), and higher average SUVmax of bone (5.49 vs. 3.40, P = 0.04) and soft tissue lesions (8.02 vs. 3.90, P = 0.0002).

conclusionsIn patients with clinical NEPC, we demonstrate that FDG-PET has clinical utility in the detection of metastatic disease. In addition to detection, PET allows for treatment response to determine tumor viability. With novel therapies on the horizon to treat NEPC, consideration to investigate the use of FDG-PET to monitor response is warranted.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overBone NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPositron-Emission TomographyPrevalenceProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSoft Tissue NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18FDGneuroendocrinePETprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID24913988
PMCPMC4355960
OpenAlexW2153021665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.