Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24913099›Full record

ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2014

Engaging medical students in research: reaching out to the next generation of physician-scientists.

Jeff Cluver, Sarah Book, Kathleen Brady, Sudie Back, Nicola Thornley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The promotion of academic medicine through student-led initiatives.International journal of medical education · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeff CluverMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA, cluverj@musc.edu.
Sarah Book
Kathleen Brady
Sudie Back
Nicola Thornley

Funding

Drug Abuse Research Training (DART) ProgramR25DA020537 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KATHLEEN T. BRADY, Sudie E Back · 2006 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA020537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe authors describe a multifaceted educational training approach aimed at increasing medical student involvement in psychiatric research.

methodA description of the initiative is provided, including the rationale and expected impact of each component.

resultsMedical student involvement in research projects has increased steadily since implementation. This applies to summer research projects as well as elective research rotations for senior medical students. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of students who participate in research continue to engage in research activities following completion of the program (e.g., through additional research participation, conference presentations).

conclusionA proactive and well-organized approach to encouraging medical student participation in research can increase the number of students who choose to engage in a research and may ultimately help increase the number of physician-scientists.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalBiomedical ResearchCareer ChoiceCurriculumData CollectionFellowships and ScholarshipsHumansPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID24913099
PMCPMC4052462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.