ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2014
Is transparency really a panacea?
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- COVID-19 Pandemic, Transparency, and "Polidemic" in the Republic of Korea.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- Article
- Association between gifts from pharmaceutical companies to French general practitioners and their drug prescribing patterns in 2016: retrospective study using the French Transparency in Healthcare and National Health Data System databases.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Observational
- Conflict of interest disclosure: striking a balance?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019Article
- What Does 'Unpaid Consultant' Signify? A Survey of Euphemistic Language in Conflict of Interest Declarations.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Article
- On the pitfalls of disclosure statements.Public health nutrition · 2016Article
- Proliferation of gynaecological scientific societies and their financial transparency: an Italian survey.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Under-reporting of conflicts of interest among trialists: a cross-sectional study.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2015Article
- 'If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change'*.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2014Article
- Why transparency isn't an unassailable philosophical principle.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.