ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2014
Natural history and outcome of 200 outpatients with classical trigeminal neuralgia treated with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in a tertiary centre for neuropathic pain.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compared to oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine, botulinum toxin type A is a useful therapeutic option for trigeminal neuralgia symptoms: A systematic review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Pooled it
- Photobiomodulation on trigeminal neuralgia: systematic review.Lasers in medical science · 2021Pooled it
- Invasive and Non-Invasive Electrical Neuromodulation in Trigeminal Nerve Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current neuropharmacology · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of rescue analgesic strategies in acute exacerbations of primary trigeminal neuralgia.British journal of anaesthesia · 2019Pooled it
- Oxcarbazepine for neuropathic pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Trigeminal neuralgia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2014Pooled it
- Electroacupuncture and carbamazepine for patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a randomized, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial.Journal of neurology · 2024Trial
- Triple Puncture for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Current medical science · 2019Trial
- Duplication of Right Superior Cerebellar Artery Leading to Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Rare Neurovascular Conflict.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging Pharmacological Strategies for Trigeminal Neuralgia.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Consensus on the Clinical Use of Pregabalin in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Article
- Neurovascular Compression Syndromes of Cranial Nerves: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Management.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- TRPM3 mediates spontaneous pain and mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of chronic orofacial neuropathy.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Use of Cryoneurolysis Therapy for the Management of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Electroacupuncture for trigeminal neuralgia with anxiety disorders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Updated Evidence of Acupuncture for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with GRADE Assessment.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Centrally Acting Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Sharing Molecular Targets with Drugs for Neuropathic Pain Management.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe guidelines on trigeminal neuralgia management that have been agreed and jointly published by the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies recommend carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) as the first-choice medical treatments in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the natural history of classical trigeminal neuralgia in a large cohort of patients, focusing on drug responsiveness, side effects related to CBZ and OXC, and changes in pain characteristics during the course of disease.
findingsWe selected the last 100 consecutive patients with typical TN who began treatment with CBZ and the last 100 with OXC. All had MRI scans and a complete neurophysiological study of trigeminal reflexes. Among them, 22 were excluded on the basis of neuroradiological or neurophysiological investigations, to avoid the inclusion of patients with possible secondary TN. The initial number of responders was 98% with CBZ with a median dose of 600 mg (range 200-1200), and of 94% with OXC, with a median dose of 1200 mg (range 600-1800). In a mean period of 8.6 months, 27% of responders to CBZ incurred in undesired effects to a level that caused interruption of treatment or a dosage reduction to an unsatisfactory level. In a mean period of 13 months, the same occurred to 18% of responders to OXC. Among patients who had a good initial response, only 3 patients with CBZ and 2 with OXC developed late resistance. During the course of disease, paroxysms worsened in intensity in 3% of patients, and paroxysms duration increased in 2%. We did not observe the onset of a clinically manifest sensory deficit at any time in any patient.
conclusionsUnlike common notion, in our large patient sample the worsening of pain with time and the development of late resistance only occurred in a very small minority of patients. CBZ and OXC were confirmed to be efficacious in a large majority of patients, but the side effects caused withdrawal from treatment in an important percentage of patients. These results suggest the opportunity to develop a better tolerated drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.