Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24912189›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Control of catalytic efficiency by a coevolving network of catalytic and noncatalytic residues.

Thomas A McMurrough, Russell J Dickson, Stephanie M F Thibert, Gregory B Gloor, David R Edgell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Naught all zeros in sequence count data are the same.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Correlated positions in protein evolution and engineering.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas A McMurroughDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1.
Russell J DicksonDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1.
Stephanie M F ThibertDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1.
Gregory B GloorDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1 dedgell@uwo.ca ggloor@uwo.ca.
David R EdgellDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5C1 dedgell@uwo.ca ggloor@uwo.ca.
Western University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 97780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The active sites of enzymes consist of residues necessary for catalysis and structurally important noncatalytic residues that together maintain the architecture and function of the active site. Examples of evolutionary interactions between catalytic and noncatalytic residues have been difficult to define and experimentally validate due to a general intolerance of these residues to substitution. Here, using computational methods to predict coevolving residues, we identify a network of positions consisting of two catalytic metal-binding residues and two adjacent noncatalytic residues in LAGLIDADG homing endonucleases (LHEs). Distinct combinations of the four residues in the network map to distinct LHE subfamilies, with a striking distribution of the metal-binding Asp (D) and Glu (E) residues. Mutation of these four positions in three LHEs--I-LtrI, I-OnuI, and I-HjeMI--indicate that the combinations of residues tolerated are specific to each enzyme. Kinetic analyses under single-turnover conditions revealed that I-LtrI activity could be modulated over an ∼100-fold range by mutation of residues in the coevolving network. I-LtrI catalytic site variants with low activity could be rescued by compensatory mutations at adjacent noncatalytic sites that restore an optimal coevolving network and vice versa. Our results demonstrate that LHE activity is constrained by an evolutionary barrier of residues with strong context-dependent effects. Creation of optimal coevolving active-site networks is therefore an important consideration in engineering of LHEs and other enzymes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMutationAspartic AcidBinding SitesBiocatalysisCatalytic DomainEndonucleasesGlutamic AcidModels, GeneticModels, MolecularPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiaryAspartic AcidEndonucleasesGlutamic Acidamino acid coevolutiongenetic selection

Identifiers

PMID24912189
PMCPMC4060692
OpenAlexW2082770144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.