Trial reportThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2014
Prognostic subgroups for citalopram response in the STAR*D trial.
Trial report in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression
ASHA Bangladesh--An Integrated Intervention to Address Depression in Low Income Rural Women
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social inequalities in antidepressant treatment outcomes: a systematic review.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020Pooled it
- Initial evaluation of a personalized advantage index to determine which individuals may benefit from mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for suicide prevention.Behaviour research and therapy · 2024Trial
- The ASHA (Hope) Project: Testing an Integrated Depression Treatment and Economic Strengthening Intervention in Rural Bangladesh: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Pretreatment Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Theta Activity in Relation to Symptom Improvement in Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA psychiatry · 2018Trial
- Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in a Community Health Setting.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2017Trial
- Predictors of anxiety recurrence in the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) trial.Journal of psychiatric research · 2015Trial
- Serum Cytokines as Biomarkers for Comorbid Anxiety in Postpartum Depression: A Machine Learning Approach.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors associated with self-reported antidepressant response outcomes in the UK Biobank.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Heterogeneity of depression across the socioeconomic spectrum.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Vortioxetine in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder in Real-World Clinical Practice: Results of the RELIEVE Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Patients with geographic barriers to health care access are prescribed a higher proportion of drugs with pharmacogenetic testing guidelines.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Genetic and clinical characteristics of treatment-resistant depression using primary care records in two UK cohorts.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Article
- Article
- Inclusion of genetic variants in an ensemble of gradient boosting decision trees does not improve the prediction of citalopram treatment response.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Anxiety symptoms in working patients with major depressive disorder treated with vortioxetine: associations with clinical and treatment outcomes in the AtWoRC study.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Moderation by socioeconomic status of the relationship between familiarity with mental illness and stigma outcomes.SSM - population health · 2020Article
- Personalized Psychiatry and Depression: The Role of Sociodemographic and Clinical Variables.Psychiatry investigation · 2020Article
- Personalized prediction of antidepressant v. placebo response: evidence from the EMBARC study.Psychological medicine · 2019Article
- Analysis of Features Selected by a Deep Learning Model for Differential Treatment Selection in Depression.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFew data exist to help clinicians predict likelihood of treatment response in individual patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Our aim was to identify subgroups of MDD patients with differential treatment outcomes based on presenting clinical characteristics. We also sought to quantify the likelihood of treatment success based on the degree of improvement and side effects after 2 and 4 weeks of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) pharmacotherapy.
methodWe analyzed data from the first treatment phase of the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial, in which subjects with a DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD were treated for 8-14 weeks with open-label citalopram. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine homogenous subgroups with different rates of response and remission in depressive symptoms. Included predictor variables were initial clinical characteristics, initial improvement, and side effects after 2 and 4 weeks of SSRI treatment. The primary outcome measures were treatment response (defined as a greater than 50% reduction in 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS-17] score from baseline) and remission (defined as an HDRS-17 score ≤ 17).
resultsBaseline clinical characteristics were able to identify subgroups from a low likelihood of response of 18% (income < $10,000, comorbid generalized anxiety disorder, < 16 years of education; P < .01) to a high likelihood of response of 68% (income ≥ $40,000, no comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder; P < .01). Among baseline clinical characteristics, employment status (N = 2,477; χ²₁ = 78.1; P < .001) and income level (N = 2,512; χ²₁ = 77.7; P < .001) were the most informative in predicting treatment outcome. For the models at weeks 2 and 4, treatment success was best predicted by early symptom improvement.
conclusionsSocioeconomic data such as low income, education, and unemployment were most discriminative in predicting a poor response to citalopram, even with disparities in access to care accounted for. This finding implies that socioeconomic factors may be more useful predictors of medication response than traditional psychiatric diagnoses or past treatment history.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00021528.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.