Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24911814›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Effect of tonic pain on motor acquisition and retention while learning to reach in a force field.

Mélanie Lamothe, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Jason Bouffard, Martin Gagné, Laurent J Bouyer, Catherine Mercier

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Acute pain impairs retention of locomotor learning.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mélanie LamotheCentre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Département de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Sébastien RoyCentre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Département de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Jason BouffardCentre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Département de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Martin GagnéCentre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Laurent J BouyerCentre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Département de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Catherine MercierCentre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale (CIRRIS), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Département de réadaptation, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-125869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients receiving intensive rehabilitation to improve their upper limb function experience pain. Despite this, the impact of pain on the ability to learn a specific motor task is still unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of experimental tonic pain interferes with the acquisition and retention stages of motor learning associated with training in a reaching task. Twenty-nine healthy subjects were randomized to either a Control or Pain Group (receiving topical capsaicin cream on the upper arm during training on Day 1). On two consecutive days, subjects made ballistic movements towards two targets (NEAR/FAR) using a robotized exoskeleton. On Day 1, the task was performed without (baseline) and with a force field (adaptation). The adaptation task was repeated on Day 2. Task performance was assessed using index distance from the target at the end of the reaching movement. Motor planning was assessed using initial angle of deviation of index trajectory from a straight line to the target. Results show that tonic pain did not affect baseline reaching. Both groups improved task performance across time (p<0.001), but the Pain group showed a larger final error (under-compensation) than the Control group for the FAR target (p = 0.030) during both acquisition and retention. Moreover, a Group x Time interaction (p = 0.028) was observed on initial angle of deviation, suggesting that subjects with Pain made larger adjustments in the feedforward component of the movement over time. Interestingly, behaviour of the Pain group was very stable from the end of Day 1 (with pain) to the beginning of Day 2 (pain-free), indicating that the differences observed could not solely be explained by the impact of pain on immediate performance. This suggests that if people learn to move differently in the presence of pain, they might maintain this altered strategy over time.

Indexed as

PainAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdministration, TopicalAdultCapsaicinExoskeleton DeviceFemaleHumansLearningMaleRetention, PsychologySensory System AgentsUpper ExtremityCapsaicinSensory System Agents

Identifiers

PMID24911814
PMCPMC4049621
OpenAlexW2064490865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.