Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24911649›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Strigolactones inhibit caulonema elongation and cell division in the moss Physcomitrella patens.

Beate Hoffmann, Hélène Proust, Katia Belcram, Cécile Labrune, François-Didier Boyer, Catherine Rameau, Sandrine Bonhomme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Plant apocarotenoids: from retrograde signaling to interspecific communication.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Perception of karrikins by plants: a continuing enigma.Journal of experimental botany · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beate HoffmannInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.
Hélène ProustInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.
Katia BelcramInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.
Cécile LabruneInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.
François-Didier BoyerInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-AgroParisTech, Versailles, France,; Centre de Recherche de Gif, Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, UPR2301 CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Catherine RameauInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.
Sandrine BonhommeInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique-AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vascular plants, strigolactones (SLs) are known for their hormonal role and for their role as signal molecules in the rhizosphere. SLs are also produced by the moss Physcomitrella patens, in which they act as signaling factors for controlling filament extension and possibly interaction with neighboring individuals. To gain a better understanding of SL action at the cellular level, we investigated the effect of exogenously added molecules (SLs or analogs) in moss growth media. We used the previously characterized Ppccd8 mutant that is deficient in SL synthesis and showed that SLs affect moss protonema extension by reducing caulonema cell elongation and mainly cell division rate, both in light and dark conditions. Based on this effect, we set up bioassays to examine chemical structure requirements for SL activity in moss. The results suggest that compounds GR24, GR5, and 5-deoxystrigol are active in moss (as in pea), while other analogs that are highly active in the control of pea branching show little activity in moss. Interestingly, the karrikinolide KAR1, which shares molecular features with SLs, did not have any effect on filament growth, even though the moss genome contains several genes homologous to KAI2 (encoding the KAR1 receptor) and no canonical homologue to D14 (encoding the SL receptor). Further studies should investigate whether SL signaling pathways have been conserved during land plant evolution.

Indexed as

BryophytaFlowersLactonesLightMutationPlant CellsPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant Proteins5-deoxystrigolGR24 compoundLactonesPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24911649
PMCPMC4049778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.