ArticleCurrent nutrition reports2012
Nutrigenomics and Cancer Prevention.
Article in Current nutrition reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of nutrition in harnessing the immune system: a potential approach to prevent cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Nutrigenomics: A tool to unlock genetic potential of Nigerian indigenous goat breeds.Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Vitamin D in Cancer Prevention and Treatment: A Review of Epidemiological, Preclinical, and Cellular Studies.Cancers · 2024Review
- The role of diet in cancer: the potential of shaping public policy and clinical outcomes in the UK.Genes & nutrition · 2024Review
- Nutritional Genomics and Cancer Prevention.Cancer treatment and research · 2024Review
- Article
- Nutrigenomics in livestock sector and its human-animal interface-a review.Veterinary and animal science · 2022Review
- Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics, Personalized Nutrition, and Precision Healthcare.Current nutrition reports · 2020Review
- Transforming Cancer Epigenetics Using Nutritive Approaches and Noncoding RNAs.Current cancer drug targets · 2018Review
- Selenium and prostate cancer prevention: insights from the selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial (SELECT).Nutrients · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mounting evidence continues to point to dietary habits as a modifier of cancer risk and tumor behavior; although it is clear that considerable variability occurs across studies. While genetic public health messages can be developed, the use of mean values may result in underexposure to some essential and nonessential food components, yet precipitate overexposure to nutrients. Undeniably, inconsistencies in the literature may reflect variation in timing of exposures to specific dietary constituents, interactions with the food matrix, processing technologies, or the genomic variation among individuals, which can influence absorption, metabolism, and/or the molecular target. Inter-individual variability in genetics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, or microbiomics can influence the magnitude and direction of response to bioactive food components, as briefly reviewed in this article. Unquestionably, understanding nutrigenomics holds promise to reveal those who will benefit most from dietary interventions plus identify any who might be placed at risk due to overexposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.