Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24910447›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2014

Determinants and implications of mRNA poly(A) tail size--does this protein make my tail look big?

Aimee L Jalkanen, Stephen J Coleman, Jeffrey Wilusz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Translational Fidelity Decline in the Aging Oocyte and Embryo Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Advances in nucleic acid-based cancer vaccines.Journal of biomedical science · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aimee L JalkanenDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Stephen J ColemanDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Jeffrey WiluszDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. Electronic address: jeffrey.wilusz@colostate.edu.

Funding

Biomedical Research Training for VeterinariansT32OD010437 · OD · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Gregg A Dean, KELLY S SANTANGELO · 2012 to 2026
$6.2M
Mechanism of Regulation of mRNA StabilityR01GM072481 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · PI WILUSZ, JEFFREY · 2004 to 2011
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM072481NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072481NIH HHS T32 OD010437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the phenomenon of polyadenylation has been well-studied, the dynamics of poly(A) tail size and its impact on transcript function and cell biology are less well-appreciated. The goal of this review is to encourage readers to view the poly(A) tail as a dynamic, changeable aspect of a transcript rather than a simple static entity that marks the 3' end of an mRNA. This could open up new angles of regulation in the post-transcriptional control of gene expression throughout development, differentiation and cancer.

Indexed as

PolyadenylationAnimalsBase SequenceGene Expression RegulationHumansRNA, MessengerRNA, MessengerDeadenylationHyperadenylationmRNA 3′ end processingPolyadenylationPoly(A) tail

Identifiers

PMID24910447
PMCPMC4163081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.