Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24910306›Full record

ReviewAgeing research reviews2014

Aging and longevity in the simplest animals and the quest for immortality.

Ronald S Petralia, Mark P Mattson, Pamela J Yao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ageing research reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. DNA methylation extends lifespan in the bumblebeeProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Sirtuin Evolution at the Dawn of Animal Life.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Asymmetry, division of labour and the evolution of ageing in multicellular organisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Evolution of the Hallmarks of Aging.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald S PetraliaAdvanced Imaging Core, NIDCD/NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States. Electronic address: petralia@nidcd.nih.gov.
Mark P MattsonLaboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States.
Pamela J YaoLaboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD 21224, United States.
National Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Advanced Imaging CoreZICDC000081 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI WINKLER, DENNIS · 2012 to 2025
$17.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC DC000081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we review the examples of great longevity and potential immortality in the earliest animal types and contrast and compare these to humans and other higher animals. We start by discussing aging in single-celled organisms such as yeast and ciliates, and the idea of the immortal cell clone. Then we describe how these cell clones could become organized into colonies of different cell types that lead to multicellular animal life. We survey aging and longevity in all of the basal metazoan groups including ctenophores (comb jellies), sponges, placozoans, cnidarians (hydras, jellyfish, corals and sea anemones) and myxozoans. Then we move to the simplest bilaterian animals (with a head, three body cell layers, and bilateral symmetry), the two phyla of flatworms. A key determinant of longevity and immortality in most of these simple animals is the large numbers of pluripotent stem cells that underlie the remarkable abilities of these animals to regenerate and rejuvenate themselves. Finally, we discuss briefly the evolution of the higher bilaterians and how longevity was reduced and immortality lost due to attainment of greater body complexity and cell cycle strategies that protect these complex organisms from developing tumors. We also briefly consider how the evolution of multiple aging-related mechanisms/pathways hinders our ability to understand and modify the aging process in higher organisms.

Indexed as

LongevityAge FactorsAgingAnimalsBiological EvolutionCiliophoraCnidariaHumansHydraInvertebratesPlatyhelminthsPoriferaSpecies SpecificityYeastsBilateriaCnidariaHydraMetazoaNeoblastPlanaria

Identifiers

PMID24910306
PMCPMC4133289
OpenAlexW2028921947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.