ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2015
Combination of MUC1 and MUC4 expression predicts clinical outcome in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunohistochemical Analysis of MUC1 and MUC4 Co-expression in Oral Leukoplakia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Annals of African medicine · 2026Observational
- Viral Integration Plays a Minor Role in the Development and Prognostication of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2022Article
- Immunohistochemical Coexpression of MUC1 and MUC4 in Oral Leukoplakia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Head and neck pathology · 2021Article
- Targeting interleukin-17 receptor B enhances gemcitabine sensitivity through downregulation of mucins in pancreatic cancer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A Novel Nomogram for Individually Predicting of Vascular Invasion in Gastric Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth MUC1 and MUC4 are high molecular weight glycoproteins and are independent indicators of worse prognosis in many human epithelial cancers including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, there has been no investigation of the clinical importance of the co-expression of MUC1 and MUC4 in OSCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the co-expression profile of MUC1/MUC4 and analyze the prognostic significance in OSCC.
methodsWe examined the expression profile of MUC1 and MUC4 in OSCC tissues from 206 patients using immunohistochemistry. The co-expression profile of MUC1/MUC4 and its prognostic significance in OSCC was statistically analyzed.
resultsMUC1 and MUC4 overexpression were strongly correlated with each other (p < 0.0001) and a combination of both MUC1 and MUC4 expression was a powerful indicator for tumor aggressiveness such as tumor size (p = 0.014), lymph node metastasis (0.0001), tumor stage (p = 0.006), diffuse invasion (p = 0.028), and vascular invasion (p = 0.014). The MUC1/MUC4 double-positive patients showed the poorest overall and disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that MUC1/MUC4 double-positivity was the strong independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival (p = 0.007 and (p = 0.0019), in addition to regional recurrence (p = 0.0025).
conclusionsTaken together, these observations indicate that the use of a combination of MUC1/MUC4 can predict outcomes for patients with OSCC. This combination is also a useful marker for predicting regional recurrence. MUC1 and MUC4 may be attractive targets for the selection of treatment methods in OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.