Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24909407›Full record

ReviewGlobal health action2014

The first 500 days of life: policies to support maternal nutrition.

John B Mason, Roger Shrimpton, Lisa S Saldanha, Usha Ramakrishnan, Cesar G Victora, Amy Webb Girard, Deborah A McFarland, Reynaldo Martorell

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health action, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Linear growth trajectories in Zimbabwean infants.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2016
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. A Cross-sectional Study to Determine the Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women using Mid-upper Arm Circumference and Neck Circumference.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Development and Validation of a Protocol for Pregnant Women Based on the Brazilian Dietary Guidelines.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John B MasonDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA; masonj@tulane.edu.
Roger ShrimptonDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Lisa S SaldanhaDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Usha RamakrishnanHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Cesar G VictoraDepartment of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Amy Webb GirardHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Deborah A McFarlandHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Reynaldo MartorellHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USTulane University · USUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom conception to 6 months of age, an infant is entirely dependent for its nutrition on the mother: via the placenta and then ideally via exclusive breastfeeding. This period of 15 months--about 500 days--is the most important and vulnerable in a child's life: it must be protected through policies supporting maternal nutrition and health. Those addressing nutritional status are discussed here. OBJECTIVE AND

designThis paper aims to summarize research on policies and programs to protect women's nutrition in order to improve birth outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, based on studies of efficacy from the literature, and on effectiveness, globally and in selected countries involving in-depth data collection in communities in Ethiopia, India and Northern Nigeria. Results of this research have been published in the academic literature (more than 30 papers). The conclusions now need to be advocated to policy-makers.

resultsThe priority problems addressed are: intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), women's anemia, thinness, and stunting. The priority interventions that need to be widely expanded for women before and during pregnancy, are: supplementation with iron-folic acid or multiple micronutrients; expanding coverage of iodine fortification of salt particularly to remote areas and the poorest populations; targeted provision of balanced protein energy supplements when significant resources are available; reducing teenage pregnancies; increasing interpregnancy intervals through family planning programs; and building on conditional cash transfer programs, both to provide resources and as a platform for public education. All these have known efficacy but are of inadequate coverage and resourcing. The next steps are to overcome barriers to wide implementation, without which targets for maternal and child health and nutrition (e.g. by WHO) are unlikely to be met, especially in the poorest countries.

conclusionsThis agenda requires policy decisions both at Ministry and donor levels, and throughout the administrative system. Evidence-based interventions are established as a basis for these decisions, there are clear advocacy messages, and there are no scientific reasons for delay.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutrition PolicyFemaleFetal Nutrition DisordersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalnutritionNutritional StatusPregnancyanemiaintrauterine growth restrictionmaternal nutritionnutrition interventionswomen's health

Identifiers

PMID24909407
PMCPMC4049132
OpenAlexW1964569066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.