Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24908350›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2014

Antegrade versus retrograde cerebral perfusion for hemiarch replacement with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: does it matter? A propensity-matched analysis.

Asvin M Ganapathi, Jennifer M Hanna, Matthew A Schechter, Brian R Englum, Anthony W Castleberry, Jeffrey G Gaca, G Chad Hughes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anesthetic Management for Proximal Aortic Repair.Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cerebral protection strategies for type A aortic dissection repair.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Does deeper hypothermia reduce the risk of acute kidney injury after circulatory arrest for aortic arch surgery?European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Aortic valve repair with a newly approved geometric annuloplasty ring in patients undergoing proximal aortic repair: early results from a single-centre experience.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2020
    Article
  13. Neuroprotective Strategies in Repair and Replacement of the Aortic Arch.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Asvin M GanapathiDuke Center for Aortic Disease, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Jennifer M HannaDuke Center for Aortic Disease, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Matthew A SchechterDuke Center for Aortic Disease, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Brian R EnglumDuke Center for Aortic Disease, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Anthony W CastleberryDuke Center for Aortic Disease, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Jeffrey G GacaDuke Center for Aortic Disease, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
G Chad HughesDuke Center for Aortic Disease, Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. Electronic address: gchad.hughes@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Cardiothoracic Surgical Network Clinical CenterU01HL088953 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PETER K · 2007 to 2013
$2.6M
Core Clinical Centers for the CTSNUM1HL088953 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PETER K · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL115769NHLBI NIH HHS L30HL115769-01NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL088953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe choice of cerebral perfusion strategy for aortic arch surgery has been debated, and the superiority of antegrade (ACP) or retrograde (RCP) cerebral perfusion has not been shown. We examined the early and late outcomes for ACP versus RCP in proximal (hemi-) arch replacement using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA).

methodsA retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed for all patients undergoing elective and nonelective hemiarch replacement at a single referral institution from June 2005 to February 2013. Total arch cases were excluded to limit the analysis to shorter DHCA times and a more uniform patient population for whom clinical equipoise regarding ACP versus RCP exists. A total of 440 procedures were identified, with 360 (82%) using ACP and 80 (18%) using RCP. The endpoints included 30-day/in-hospital and late outcomes. A propensity score with 1:1 matching of 40 pre- and intraoperative variables was used to adjust for differences between the 2 groups.

resultsAll 80 RCP patients were propensity matched to a cohort of 80 similar ACP patients. The pre- and intraoperative characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups after matching. No differences were found in 30-day/in-hospital mortality or morbidity outcomes. The only significant difference between the 2 groups was a shorter mean operative time in the RCP cohort (P = .01). No significant differences were noted in late survival (P = .90).

conclusionsIn proximal arch operations using DHCA, equivalent early and late outcomes can be achieved with RCP and ACP, although the mean operative time is significantly less with RCP, likely owing to avoidance of axillary cannulation. Questions remain regarding comparative outcomes with straight DHCA and lesser degrees of hypothermia.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationCerebrovascular CirculationCirculatory Arrest, Deep Hypothermia InducedAdultAgedAorta, ThoracicAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicAortic DissectionAortic RuptureChi-Square DistributionFemaleHospital MortalityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24908350
PMCPMC4336168
OpenAlexW2062532602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.