Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24908250›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2014

Quantitative genome-wide enhancer activity maps for five Drosophila species show functional enhancer conservation and turnover during cis-regulatory evolution.

Cosmas D Arnold, Daniel Gerlach, Daniel Spies, Jessica A Matts, Yuliya A Sytnikova, Michaela Pagani, Nelson C Lau, Alexander Stark

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NovelbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Introducing the EpGEpigenomes · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cosmas D Arnold1] Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria. [2].
Daniel Gerlach1] Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria. [2] [3].
Daniel SpiesResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Jessica A Matts1] Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Rosenstiel Basic Medical Science Research Center at Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. [3].
Yuliya A Sytnikova1] Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Rosenstiel Basic Medical Science Research Center at Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Michaela PaganiResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Nelson C Lau1] Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Rosenstiel Basic Medical Science Research Center at Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexander StarkResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
Brandeis University · USVienna Biocenter · ATResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · AT

Funding

The Function of piRNAs and the piRNA ComplexR00HD057298 · NICHD · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LAU, NELSON C · 2009 to 2011
$706k
The Function of piRNAs and the piRNA ComplexK99HD057298 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAU, NELSON C · 2008 to 2009
$171k
European Research Council 242922NICHD NIH HHS HD057298NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD057298NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD057298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic differences between closely related species are thought to arise primarily from changes in gene expression due to mutations in cis-regulatory sequences (enhancers). However, it has remained unclear how frequently mutations alter enhancer activity or create functional enhancers de novo. Here we use STARR-seq, a recently developed quantitative enhancer assay, to determine genome-wide enhancer activity profiles for five Drosophila species in the constant trans-regulatory environment of Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. We find that the functions of a large fraction of D. melanogaster enhancers are conserved for their orthologous sequences owing to selection and stabilizing turnover of transcription factor motifs. Moreover, hundreds of enhancers have been gained since the D. melanogaster-Drosophila yakuba split about 11 million years ago without apparent adaptive selection and can contribute to changes in gene expression in vivo. Our finding that enhancer activity is often deeply conserved and frequently gained provides functional insights into regulatory evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsCells, CulturedDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLuciferasesTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsLuciferasesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24908250
PMCPMC4250274
OpenAlexW2170739826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.