Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24908078›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Infection routes matter in population-specific responses of the red flour beetle to the entomopathogen Bacillus thuringiensis.

Sarah Behrens, Robert Peuß, Barbara Milutinović, Hendrik Eggert, Daniela Esser, Philip Rosenstiel, Hinrich Schulenburg, Erich Bornberg-Bauer, Joachim Kurtz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathogen growth and virulence dynamics drive the host evolution against coinfections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Proteins inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Response Mechanisms of Invertebrates toMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Experimental evolution of immunological specificity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah BehrensInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstr, 1, 48149 Münster, Germany. sbehrens@uni-muenster.de.
Robert Peuß
Barbara Milutinović
Hendrik Eggert
Daniela Esser
Philip Rosenstiel
Hinrich Schulenburg
Erich Bornberg-Bauer
Joachim Kurtz
University of Münster · DEInstitute for Biodiversity · DEKiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathogens can infect their hosts through different routes. For studying the consequences for host resistance, we here used the entomopathogen Bacillus thuringiensis and the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum for oral and systemic (i. e. pricking the cuticle) experimental infection. In order to characterize the molecular mechanisms underpinning the two different infection routes, the transcriptomes of beetles of two different T. castaneum populations--one recently collected population (Cro1) and a commonly used laboratory strain (SB)--were analyzed using a next generation RNA sequencing approach.

resultsThe genetically more diverse population Cro1 showed a significantly larger number of differentially expressed genes. While both populations exhibited similar reactions to pricking, their expression patterns in response to oral infection differed remarkably. In particular, the Cro1 population showed a strong response of cuticular proteins and developmental genes, which might indicate an adaptive developmental flexibility that was lost in the SB population presumably as a result of inbreeding. The immune response of SB was primarily based on antimicrobial peptides, while Cro1 relied on responses mediated by phenoloxidase and reactive oxygen species, which may explain the higher resistance of this strain against oral infection.

conclusionsOur data demonstrate that immunological and physiological processes underpinning the two different routes of infection are clearly distinct, and that host populations particularly differ in responses to oral infection. Furthermore, gene expression upon pricking infection entailed a strong signal of wounding, highlighting the importance of pricking controls in future infection studies.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsBacillus thuringiensisCluster AnalysisColeopteraComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationSignal TransductionTime FactorsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID24908078
PMCPMC4079954
OpenAlexW2030518203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.