Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24907327›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Genomic heterogeneity and ecological speciation within one subspecies of Bacillus subtilis.

Sarah Kopac, Zhang Wang, Jane Wiedenbeck, Jessica Sherry, Martin Wu, Frederick M Cohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Isolation and Identification ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Kin discrimination between sympatric Bacillus subtilis isolates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah KopacDepartment of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.
Zhang WangDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jane WiedenbeckDepartment of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.
Jessica SherryDepartment of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.
Martin WuDepartment of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Frederick M CohanDepartment of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA fcohan@wesleyan.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closely related bacterial genomes usually differ in gene content, suggesting that nearly every strain in nature may be ecologically unique. We have tested this hypothesis by sequencing the genomes of extremely close relatives within a recognized taxon and analyzing the genomes for evidence of ecological distinctness. We compared the genomes of four Death Valley isolates plus the laboratory strain W23, all previously classified as Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii and hypothesized through multilocus analysis to be members of the same ecotype (an ecologically homogeneous population), named putative ecotype 15 (PE15). These strains showed a history of positive selection on amino acid sequences in 38 genes. Each of the strains was under a different regimen of positive selection, suggesting that each strain is ecologically unique and represents a distinct ecological speciation event. The rate of speciation appears to be much faster than can be resolved with multilocus sequencing. Each PE15 strain contained unique genes known to confer a function for bacteria. Remarkably, no unique gene conferred a metabolic system or subsystem function that was not already present in all the PE15 strains sampled. Thus, the origin of ecotypes within this clade shows no evidence of qualitative divergence in the set of resources utilized. Ecotype formation within this clade is consistent with the nanoniche model of bacterial speciation, in which ecotypes use the same set of resources but in different proportions, and genetic cohesion extends beyond a single ecotype to the set of ecotypes utilizing the same resources.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenome, BacterialBacillus subtilisGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24907327
PMCPMC4135754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.