Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24907325›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus by free-living wild animals in Spain.

M Concepción Porrero, Gregorio Mentaberre, Sergio Sánchez, Pedro Fernández-Llario, Encarna Casas-Díaz, Ana Mateos, Dolors Vidal, Santiago Lavín, José-Francisco Fernández-Garayzábal, Lucas Domínguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathogenic Potential of Coagulase-PositiveAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. High toxinogenic potential ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Epidemiology of Animal-Associated Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Characterisation of aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Genomic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Sequence Analysis of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Nocturnal Birds of Prey as Carriers ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Wild Animals Are Reservoirs and Sentinels ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Multiple Antimicrobial Resistance in Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Lineages ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M Concepción PorreroCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain cporrero@visavet.ucm.es.
Gregorio MentaberreServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Wildlife Diseases Research Group, Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Sergio SánchezInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Pedro Fernández-LlarioRed de Recursos Faunísticos, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Encarna Casas-DíazServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Wildlife Diseases Research Group, Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Ana MateosCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Dolors VidalInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Santiago LavínServei d'Ecopatologia de Fauna Salvatge (SEFaS), Wildlife Diseases Research Group, Departament de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
José-Francisco Fernández-GarayzábalCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Lucas DomínguezCentro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was analyzed in different free-living wild animals to assess the genetic diversity and predominant genotypes on each animal species. Samples were taken from the skin and/or nares, and isolates were characterized by spa typing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The proportion of MSSA carriers were 5.00, 22.93, 19.78, and 17.67% in Eurasian griffon vulture, Iberian ibex, red deer, and wild boar, respectively (P = 0.057). A higher proportion of isolates (P = 0.000) were recovered from nasal samples (78.51%) than skin samples (21.49%), but the 9.26% of red deer and 18.25% of wild boar would have been undetected if only nasal samples had been tested. Sixty-three different spa types were identified, including 25 new spa types. The most common were t528 (43.59%) in Iberian ibex, t548 and t11212 (15.79% and 14.04%) in red deer, and t3750 (36.11%) in wild boar. By MLST, 27 STs were detected, of which 12 had not been described previously. The most frequent were ST581 for Iberian ibex (48.72%), ST425 for red deer (29.82%), and ST2328 for wild boar (42.36%). Isolates from Eurasian griffon vulture belong to ST133. Host specificity has been observed for the most frequent spa types and STs (P = 0.000). The highest resistance percentage was found against benzylpenicillin (average, 22.2%), although most of the S. aureus isolates were susceptible to all antimicrobial tested. Basically, MSSA isolates were different from those MRSA isolates previously detected in the same animal species.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesCarrier StateDeerDrug Resistance, BacterialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpainStaphylococcus aureusSus scrofaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24907325
PMCPMC4135777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.