ArticleLung2014
The Victorian Lung Cancer Registry pilot: improving the quality of lung cancer care through the use of a disease quality registry.
Article in Lung, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An Exploration of the Utility and Impacts of Implementation Science Strategies by Cancer Registries for Healthcare Improvement: A Systematic Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Pooled it
- Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017Pooled it
- Uneven Ground: Survival Differences Among Victorian Lung Cancer Patients by Location of Residence (2011-2023): A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Impacts of Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Meeting Presentation in a Clinical Quality Registry.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Treatment Timeliness in Extensive-Stage SCLC and Impact on Survival: A Registry-Based Observational Study.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Early Mortality Following Systemic Anticancer Therapy in Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Spatiotemporal Multilevel Analysis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Utilization of Lung Cancer Registries in Learning Health Systems for Health Care Improvement.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Review
- Impact of Stage-Specific Guideline Concordant Treatment in Small Cell Lung Cancer in Victoria, Australia.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Exploring patient reported quality of life in lung cancer patients: A qualitative study of patient-reported outcome measures.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Patient- and Areal-Level Risk Factors Associated With Lung Cancer Mortality in Victoria, Australia: A Bayesian Spatial Survival Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Time Interval Between Symptoms Onset, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Intervention in Lung Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southern Iran.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Observational
- Persisting Gaps in Optimal Care of Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Australian Patterns of Care Analysis.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Diagnostic work-up and systemic treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in four Southeast Asian countries.ESMO open · 2022Article
- Development of an Australia and New Zealand Lung Cancer Clinical Quality Registry: a protocol paper.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Quality indicators in lung cancer: a review and analysis.BMJ open quality · 2021Review
- Measurement properties of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 in Australians with lung cancer: a Rasch analysis.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- Excess mortality and undertreatment in elderly lung cancer patients: treatment nihilism in the modern era?ERJ open research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer remains a major disease burden in Victoria (Australia) and requires a complex and multidisciplinary approach to ensure optimal care and outcomes. To date, no uniform mechanism is available to capture standardized population-based outcomes and thereby provide benchmarking. The establishment of such a data platform is, therefore, a primary requisite to enable description of process and outcome in lung cancer care and to drive improvement in the quality of care provided to individuals with lung cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsA disease quality registry pilot has been established to capture prospective data on all adult patients with clinical or tissue diagnoses of small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Steering and management committees provide clinical governance and supervise quality indicator selection. Quality indicators were selected following extensive literature review and evaluation of established clinical practice guidelines. A minimum dataset has been established and training and data capture by data collectors is facilitated using a web-based portal. Case ascertainment is established by regular institutional reporting of ICD-10 discharge coding. Recruitment is optimized by provision of opt-out consent.
resultsThe collection of a standardized minimum data set optimizes capacity for harmonized population-based data capture. Data collection has commenced in a variety of settings reflecting metropolitan and rural, and public, and private health care institutions. The data set provides scope for the construction of a risk-adjusted model for outcomes. A data access policy and a mechanism for escalation policy for outcome outliers has been established.
conclusionsThe Victorian Lung Cancer Registry provides a unique capacity to provide and confirm quality assessment in lung cancer and to drive improvement in quality of care across multidisciplinary stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24907066What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.