ArticleInternational orthopaedics2014
Regenerative therapy with mesenchymal stem cells at the site of malignant primary bone tumour resection: what are the risks of early or late local recurrence?
Article in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Hip Osteonecrosis: A 30-Year Review of Progress.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Ankle osteonecrosis in fifty-one children and adolescent's leukemia survivors: a prospective randomized study on percutaneous mesenchymal stem cells treatment.International orthopaedics · 2021Trial
- Signal Pathways and microRNAs in Osteosarcoma Growth and the Dual Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Oncogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cells for bone sarcoma treatment: Roadmap to clinical practice.Journal of bone oncology · 2019Review
- Reconstructive Science in Orthopedic Oncology.Techniques in orthopaedics (Rockville, Md.) · 2018Article
- Mesenchymal stem cells increase proliferation but do not change quiescent state of osteosarcoma cells: Potential implications according to the tumor resection status.Journal of bone oncology · 2016Article
- Orthopedic cellular therapy: An overview with focus on clinical trials.World journal of orthopedics · 2015Article
- Current Perspectives in Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapies for Airway Tissue Defects.Stem cells international · 2015Review
- Tissue engineering and regenerative orthopaedics (TERO).International orthopaedics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThere is concern that regenerative cell-based therapies at the site of malignant primary bone tumours could result in increased risk of local tumour recurrence. We therefore investigated the long-term risks for site-specific recurrences in patients who had received an autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell suspension to improve healing at the host-to-allograft bone junction of the reconstruction after bone tumour resection.
methodsA total of 92 patients were treated from 1993 to 2003 with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells after bone tumour resection. Patients were monitored for cancer incidence from the date of first operation (1993) until death, or until 31 December 2013. The mean follow-up time was 15.4 years (range ten to 20 years). The average number of MSCs returned to the patient was 234,000 MSCs ± 215,000. The primary outcome was to evaluate the risk of tumorigenesis recurrence at the cell therapy treatment sites with radiographs and/or MRIs. The relative risk of cancer recurrence was expressed as the ratio of observed and expected number of cases according to three different control populations.
resultsThirteen recurrences were found at the treatment sites among the 92 patients. The expected number of recurrences based on incidence in the three cohort populations was between 15 and 20 for the same cancer, age and sex distribution. The standardized incidence ratio (equal to observed cancers divided by expected cancers) for the entire follow-up period and for all recurrences was between 0.65 and 0.86 (95 % CI 0.60-1.20).
conclusionThis study found no increased cancer local recurrence risk in patients after application of autologous cell-based therapy using bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells at the treatment site after an average follow-up period of 15.4 years, ranging from ten to 20 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.