Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24906973›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2015

Evaluation of an integrated care program for schizophrenia: concept and study design.

L Kerkemeyer, S Mostardt, J Biermann, J Wasem, A Neumann, A Walendzik, R Jahn, C Bartels, P Falkai, W Brannath and 4 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Schizophrenia spectrum and related neuropathology.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

L KerkemeyerInstitute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Schützenbahn 70, 45127, Essen, Germany, linda.kerkemeyer@medman.uni-due.de.
S Mostardt
J Biermann
J Wasem
A Neumann
A Walendzik
R Jahn
C Bartels
P Falkai
W Brannath
V Breunig-Lyriti
B Mester
J Timm
T Wobrock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concept and design of an independent scientific evaluation of different pathways of care for schizophrenia patients in Germany with respect to effectiveness and efficiency are presented. In this prospective, observational study, schizophrenia patients receiving an integrated care treatment, the intervention group (IG), are compared with patients under routine care conditions treated by the same physician (first control group, CG 1). A second control group (CG 2) of patients treated by office-based psychiatrists not participating in the integrated care program will be recruited and their data compared with the two other groups. The total amount of psychiatric hospital days after 12 months is defined as primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters comprise the frequency of psychiatric inpatient readmissions, severity of schizophrenia symptoms, remission rates and quality of life. Patients undergo assessments at baseline, month 6 and 12 using standardized and experimental questionnaires. Routine data of a regional German social health insurance fund complement information on included patients. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be performed. Until now, 137 psychiatrists included 980 patients in the integrated care project in Lower Saxony, Germany, and 47 psychiatrists (IG and both CGs) are willing to participate in the independent evaluation. For the first time, a prospective observational controlled evaluation study of a countrywide integrated care project planning to recruit 500 schizophrenia patients has started using comprehensive assessments as well as routine data of a social health insurance fund.

Indexed as

Health ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGermanyHumansMaleProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeSchizophreniaSchizophrenic PsychologyStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.