ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2015
Role of panendoscopy in identifying and managing risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in routine follow-up: a retrospective clinical evaluation.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Routine panendoscopy in oral squamous cell cancer patients: mandatory or facultative?Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- Survival analysis of 287 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients in a single institution: a retrospective comparison of two consecutive time intervals with surgical and conservative treatment approaches.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We discuss the clinical effectiveness and predictive value of routine panendoscopy for surveillance and follow-up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Retrospective comparative study. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Two hundred and four HNSCC patients (follow-up between 2004 and 2007) were retrospectively evaluated. During follow-up, panendoscopy was performed routinely once a year. To avoid unnecessary procedures, we evaluated the value of radiological and clinical parameters in follow-up. On comparing normal-computerized tomography (CT) vs. abnormal CT results, a 13-fold higher frequency of recurrence (odds ratio 12.74; 95% CI 4.22, 38.48; p < 0.001) was found. Additionally, patient medical history, clinical investigation, and recurrence pattern were significant parameters when detecting a possible recurrence. Panendoscopy could have been avoided in 40% of patients with HNSCC (173/432). A follow-up schedule avoiding routine panendoscopy in HNSCC follow-up when the combination of diagnostic parameters is satisfactory does not influence the sensitivity or specificity of the test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24906843What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.